News Update

GSTN activates functionality to file quarterly GSTR-1 returns for taxpayers having less than Rs 1.5 Cr turnoverCBEC Chairperson asks for expediting work relating to division of taxpayers; verification of transitional credit claims & timely revenue analysisWidespread tax evasion compelled GST Council to advance e-Way Bill: Sushil ModiGuwahati DRI nabs three persons with gold bars worth Rs 2.4 CroreGST - If ownership of imported goods kept in bonded warehouse is transferred, such transaction to be liable to IGST, clarifies CBECAP CM to position his State as Education HubUS taxpayers not hopeful of decline in taxes next year: PollsSC orders re-examination of 349 FDC medicines such as Corex Cough syrup + Vicks Action 500e-Way Bill - GST Council decides to notify it from Feb 1, 2018 on Inter-State movement of goodsIncome tax - Figures mentioned in loose sheet cannot be automatically treated as incriminating material, for initiating reopening: ITATCX - Revenue failing to cause enquiry to ascertain truth from IT Dept. regarding seizure of document shall not debar appellant from respective claim of CENVAT credit: CESTATFM urged to hike TDS limit for bank interest and extend date of Masala Bond TDSNewsprint publications - UP tops tally; followed by MaharashtraUnion Cabinet clears bill to substitute MCI Act to regulate 40% seats even in private medical collegesExports picks up in Nov but trade deficit also swells between Apr-NovDebit Card Payment - Govt to reimburse banks MDR charges on transactions upto Rs 2KGovt has fixed ceiling prices of 849 medicines so far: MandaviyaConsumer Helpline receives over 3 lakh plaints relating to e-commerce, banking, insurance, telecom and real estate sectorsNovember exports gallops @30.5% in Dollar termsPre-Budget Meet - Bankers urge FM to hike TDS limit of bank interest from Rs 10KCabinet okays proposal to reimburse banks MDR charges for debit card payments upto Rs 2000Cabinet approves subsidy to industrial units located in N-ECabinet okays UNESCO's Training Centre for Operational Oceanography in HyderabadCabinet okays special package for employment generation in leather & footwear sectorsCabinet okays 2nd financial restructuring proposal of Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (See 'TOG News')Cabinet nod to subsidize MDR charges on digital payments (See 'TOG News')Govt substantially reduces tariff value of gold, silver and edible oilsGST - Nebulous state of affairs - Court fully justified in initiating action for contempt, however, considering sensitivity of matter, is inclined to give one more opportunity to respondent to consider representations and pass orders: HCPM to launch 60MW Tuirial Hydro Power Project tomorrow
 
CBEC Circular 46/2017-Cus - certainly not innocuous!

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017

By K Srinivasan, IRS

CHAPTER IX of the Customs Act provides for deposit of goods into a customs bonded warehouse licensed under section 57 or 58 or 58A without payment of duty and the procedures to be followed with respect to the warehoused goods.

Sub-section (5) of section 59 provides that the importer is at liberty to transfer the ownership of such goods to another person while the goods remain deposited in the warehouse.

Value of imported goods, for purposes of charging customs duty, is determined as per section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 at the time of import i.e. at the time of filing of the into-bond Bill of Entry.

Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Customs Act provides that the rate of duty for an ex-bond Bill of Entry shall be the date on which it is filed. There is no provision to vary the assessable value of the goods at the ex-bond stage.

Therefore, duties of customs (BCD + IGST) shall be paid on the imported goods at the stage of ex-bonding on the value determined under section 14 of the Customs Act.

The point for discussion here is whether the goods while still under Import into the territory of India but before entering the customs frontier would be chargeable to IGST separately under Section 5 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or instead at the time of Customs clearance under sub-section (7) of section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

In this connection, the Author requests the readers to refer to his recent article on TIOL – High Sea Sales-A detailed analysis carried on 17 November 2017 to have a complete understanding of the Laws and Procedures surrounding Imports and their various levies of BCD, CESS and IGST.

Be that as it may, all inter-state transactions are subject to IGST. Imported goods while still being under import or after import is akin to inter-state transactions and there could be no dispute on that it attracts IGST.

It is a common trade practice whereby the original importer sells the goods to a third person -

a) While the goods are still under Import meaning before the goods enter the customs frontier but after it has entered into the territory of India or

b) After it is entered into bond.

It has been amply clarified post GST by Customs Circulars No. 33/2017 dt 1/8/2017 and No. 46/2017 dt 24/11/2017 that each of the above transactions would attract IGST.

As rightly envisioned in the provisions of sub section (12) of section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975read with Section 14 and 15(1)(b) of the Customs Act,1962, in respect of imported goods, all duties, taxes, cessess etc. shall be collected at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before the customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes.

In the former case, the importer (last buyer in the chain) would be required to furnish the entire chain of documents, such as original Invoice, high-seas-sales-contract, details of service charges/commission paid etc. to establish a link between the first contracted price of the goods and the last transaction.

In this case, the Customs declarations i.e. Bill of Entry etc. is filed by the person who buys the goods from the original importer during the said sale.

CBEC has issued various instructions regarding such sales while goods still under Import, appropriating the contract price paid by the last high sea sales buyer into the Customs valuation vide Circulars No. 32/2004-Cus., dated 11-5-2004 and now Circular No 33/2017 dated 01-08-2017.

However, in the case of the latter i.e. the transaction of sale or transfer etc. of the warehoused goods between the importer and any other person is naturally expected to be at a price higher than the assessable value of such goods.

Such a transaction squarely falls within the definition of supply of goods imported as per section 7(2) of the IGST Act in accordance with Section 20 of the said Act.

It may be noted that as per the above sub-section (2) of section 7 of the IGST Act, any supply of imported goods which takes place before they cross the customs frontiers of India and as well as after they enter the customs frontier for clearance, shall be treated as an inter-State supply.

But the point of discussion here is not about the correctness of the levy of IGST but about the time of levy and collection of taxes in each of the above cases mentioned above namely (a) and (b).

In both cases, the IGST Act as of now stands highly interconnected with Section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act 1975 read with Sections 12, 14 and 15(1) of the Customs ACT and the surrounding procedures and regulations of customs.

Accordingly, it hinges on those customs provisions for the purpose of determination of the time and place of levy and collection of IGST.

These must be levied and collected without prejudice to the fact that customs duty (which includes BCD and applicable IGST payable under the Customs Tariff Act) will be levied and collected at the ex-bond stage.

As rightly pointed out in the recent Circular, so long as such goods remain deposited in the warehouse the customs duty to be collected shall remain deferred and as also the IGST in the view of the Author.

Further, it is only when such goods are ex-bonded under section 68, shall all the duties and cesses, including IGST, deferred shall be collected, at the time, place and value as had been determined under the Customs Laws.

In conclusion, the clarification given under Circular 46/2017 dt 24-11-2017 is based on a misplaced understanding of the point of Law that -

+ when goods remain deposited in a customs bonded warehouse and are transferred by the importer to another person, the transaction will be subject to payment of IGST separately at the value determined as per section 20 of the IGST Act read with section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder and the tax liability shall be reckoned as per section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017.

The above view clearly runs counter to the proviso to Section 5 of the IGST Act which is perhaps overlooked while issuing the Circular.

It must be noticed that Section 20 of the IGST Act, subject to the provisions of the said IGST Act and the rules made thereunder, looks up to the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to time and value of supply including the scope and levy of supply.

And the provisions of the said CGST Act shall, mutatis mutandis , apply to the IGST Act, insofar as, may be, in relation to integrated tax as they apply in relation to central tax as if they are enacted under this Act:

Chapter III of IGST Act dealing with levy and collection of tax under Section 5 of that Act states as follows;

(1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (2), there shall be levied a tax called the integrated goods and services tax on all inter-State supplies of goods or services or both,…

(2) Provided that the integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962.

In the light of the above, it would look that the Circular No, 46/2017 is likely to make the IGST Law a truncated one without the support of the operative portions of the Customs Act and the regulations by the suggestions it carries vide Para5.1 and the illustration in Box“C” of the Annexure to the said Circular.

As the issue has wide reaching implications to cover even goods already in stock at duty free shops and ship stores and such other places which are customs areas under the ambit of inter-state supply independent of the existing Customs Law and practice and force levy and collection of IGST separately, as import might appear to have taken place already in respect of those goods, as per the Circular.

TIOL has been in the forefront of pointing out the ‘not-so-innocuous' nature of the subject Circular 46/2017-Cus as can be seen from the flood of incisive articles that have adorned its home page since yesterday and I too have made an earnest attempt by penning this piece.

A quick relook and confirmation of the correct legal position of Law by the Government would be the most urgent need of the hour, in the Author's humble view.

(The author is Assistant Commissioner, GST, Chennai and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: comments on payment of IGST twice

The author need not worry about payment of IGST twice. Since the IGST payable on filing of ex-bond BOE is very well available as ITC for payment of IGST on the sale of imported goods still in bonded warehouse. As the due date for payment of GST is 20th of next month sufficient time is available to avail ITC.

Posted by Ramesh M
 
Sub: CBEC Circular 46 of 2017cus certainly not innocuous

The humble view of the Author is that the issue is not so much about the applicability of IGST as it is of the time,manner and value to be determined for such levy and collection of IGST. It is also about the interdependence of the IGST Act on the Customs Legislations for its operation for levy and collection,not to speak of the possible revenue neutrality that incidentally pre exist by accident through availability of ITC.The whole body of jurisprudence around the subject should be desirably built by a definite design rather than by an accident, with a view to be free from any ambiguity and dispute is my only concern in expressing the above views pl.
Author


Posted by Sonal Arora
 
Shemaleup.net x-comics.org vr-porn360.net