News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Real Estate- ITC a double edged sword under GST

 

DECEMBER 11, 2017

By Rishab J

REAL Estate industry is considered to be the most lucrative industry and its worth in India is estimated to be about US$ 180 billion by 2020. Further, the housing sector alone contributes 5-6 per cent to the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [Source: https://www.ibef.org/industry/real-estate-india.aspx]. Apparently, the government considers the industry as an easy target to extract the maximum revenue possible.

In the erstwhile regime, both Service Tax and VAT Laws provided for levy of tax on activity of construction. The methodology of determining the value was prescribed, though there were instances of levy of both the taxes on the same value.

With the introduction of GST, the industry considered the same to be a blessing in disguise, wherein it was expected that only one tax shall be payable. But then, the intention of the legislature seems to remain identical i.e. to garner revenue.

In this article, an attempt is made to analyse one very important aspect of GST and its implication on the industry -Input Tax Credit.

According to Schedule II of the CGST Act read with Section 7 of the CGST Act, the activity of construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof, including a complex or building intended for sale to a buyer, wholly or partly, except where the entire consideration has been received after issuance of completion certificate, where required, by the competent authority or after its first occupation, whichever is earlier is considered to be a supply of service.

Therefore, where the supply takes place before receipt of completion certificate or occupancy certificate, the activity qualifies as a construction of complex service under the GST Law.

Schedule III of the CGST Act provides that sale of land after receipt of completion certificate or after first occupancy and sale of building shall be treated as neither supply of goods or services. In effect, sale after receipt of completion certificate or occupancy certificate by the builder shall not be exigible to GST.

INPUT TAX CREDIT- RELEVANT PROVISIONS AS APPLICABLE TO BUILDERS

Section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides that every registered person shall, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed is entitled to take credit of input tax charged on any supply of goods or services or both to him which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of his business. Therefore, the tax paid on inputs utilized for construction of residential or commercial complex shall be available to builder.

Section 17(5) of the CGST Act prescribes the restrictions applicable in relation to eligibility of input tax credit. The 2 major restrictions applicable to builders are-

1. If works contract service is received for construction of an immovable property except where it is an input service for further supply of works contract service. {Section 17(5)(c)}

2. If goods or services or both received by a builder for construction of an immovable property on his own account including when such goods or services or both are used in the course or furtherance of business. {Section 17(5)(d)}

A reading of Section 17(2) along with Section 17(3) of the CGST Act suggests that if common inputs/input services/capital goods are used for supplying both works contract service and sale of constructed building, the credit shall be restricted to the proportion attributable to works contract service/construction service.

Emerging Issues

A conjoint reading section 17(5)(c) and (d)and Section 17(2) of the CGST Act leads to the following conclusion -

- The restriction prescribed under Section 17(5) is notwithstanding Section 16. Hence a builder cannot avail credit on inputs used till the time he finds a buyer. This is for the reason that till such time he is said to use inputs on own account or receive works contract service for not providing further works contract service.

Let us now examine the situation where the builder opts to avail credit -

- If the builder decides to avail the credit notwithstanding the restriction prescribed in Section 17(5)(c) and (d), he shall subsequently be required to reverse the credit attributable to the portion of land during the sale of such constructed property.

- But, it is pertinent to note that if the credit is availed from the start of construction till its completion, for the flats unsold after obtaining occupancy certificate there shall be a requirement to reverse the entire credit attributable to those flats, and with no mechanism provided under GST to reverse credit availed during the course of previous years, the liability may be required to be discharged by cash.

Therefore, in the light of the aforementioned analysis, it could still be said that if the government does not relax any of the aforementioned restrictions, then the GST may further burden the industry with major Input Tax credit being unavailable and a continuing obligation for maintaining separate accounts and provisionality attached to the assessments till the project is completed and all the flats are sold.

(The author is an Associate with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Bangalore and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.