News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
No GST is leviable on goods sold/transferred while remaining in Customs bonded warehouse

 

FEBRUARY 19, 2018

By R K Singh, Member, CESTAT (Retd.)

1. THE purpose of penning this article is to demonstrate that :

(i) Customs circular no. 46/2017-Customs dated 24.11.2017 [amended on 06.12.2017] suffers from legal infirmity and internal contradictions;

(ii) There is no legal provision to levy CGST or IGST on transactions of sale/transfer of the warehoused goods continuing to remain warehoused.

2. Before proceeding further, paragraphs 4, 5 and 5.1 of the said circular are reproduced below:

"4. However, the transaction of sale / transfer etc. of the warehoused goods between the importer and any other person may be at a price higher than the assessable value of such goods. Such a transaction squarely falls within the definition of "supply" as per section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as, "CGST Act") and shall be taxable in terms of section 9 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as, "IGST Act"). It may be noted that as per sub-section (2) of section 7 of the IGST Act, any supply of imported goods which takes place before they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated as an inter-State supply. Thus, such a transaction of sale/transfer will be subject to IGST under the IGST Act. The value of such supply shall be determined in terms of section 15 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST Act and the rules made thereunder, without prejudice to the fact that customs duty (which includes BCD and applicable IGST payable under the Customs Tariff Act) will be levied and collected at the ex-bond stage.

5. Thus, in respect of goods stored in a customs bonded warehouse, there is a possibility that certain cases may involve an additional taxable event, if a transfer of ownership of warehoused goods takes place between the importer and another person, before clearance of the goods, whether for home consumption or for export.

5.1 In other words, when goods remain deposited in a customs bonded warehouse and are transferred by the importer to another person, the transaction will be subject to payment of IGST at the value determined as per section 20 of the IGST Act read with section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the rules made thereunder and the tax liability shall be reckoned as per section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017."

Internal contradictions

3. A careful perusal of the above-quoted paragraphs of the said circular shows that at one place in para 4, it is mentioned that transaction of sale/transfer etc of the warehoused goods between the importer and any other person shall be taxable in terms of section 9 of the CGST Act read with section 20 of the IGST act 2017. The same para 4 also mentions that such transaction of sale/transfer will be subject to IGST under the IGST Act. Similarly, in para 5.1 of the said circular, it is stated that when goods remain deposited in the custom bonded warehouse and are transferred by the importer to another person …….. and the tax liability shall be reckoned as per section 9 of the CGST Act 2017. The same para 5.1 also mentions that such transactions " will be subject to payment of IGST ……"

It is thus obvious that the said circular is rather messy and suffers from internal contradiction inasmuch as it (Circular) in the same breath at some places states that the transaction of sale/transfer etc of the warehoused goods shall be taxable in terms of section 9 of the CGST Act and at some other places it states that it will be subject to IGST.

No CGST can be charged on transaction of sale/transfer during the continuation of the goods in the Customs bonded warehouse

4. In terms of section 8 of the IGST Act, 'goods imported' into the territory of India till they cross the customs frontiers of India shall not be treated as intra- state supply. As the goods continuing to remain warehoused(or the goods lying in the port area awaiting Customs clearance) have been imported into India and have not crossed the customs frontiers of India, no CGST can be levied under the CGST Act on transactions of sales/transfer of such goods because CGST Act is applicable only for intra-state supplies.

No legal provision to charge IGST on transaction of sale/transfer of warehoused goods while they continue to remain in the warehouse

5. As regards the leviability of IGST on transaction of sale/transfer of warehoused goods while they continue to remain in the warehouse, (or of the goods lying the port area awaiting Customs clearance), it is pertinent to point out that in an article published under the title "No Legal Provision to Levy Integrated Tax on Imported Goods : Unbelievable But True" on 7-2-2018 in the guest column of TIOL website it has been demonstrated that there is no legal provision under which IGST under the IGST Act can be levied on the goods imported into India because the levy under Section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act is not a levy under the IGST Act; the levy under the said section 3(7) is not dependent upon the proviso to section 5(1) of the IGST Act and the said levy [i.e. the levy under the said section 3(7)] would remain unaffected even if the said proviso (i.e. proviso to section 5(1) of the IGST Act) did not exist or ceases to exist. Indeed it is understood that the Law Ministry is also of the view that the levy under section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act is a levy under entry no. 83 of List 1 (Seventh Schedule of the Constitution).

Finale

5. The sum total of what has been stated in the preceding paragraphs fulfils the purposes for which this article was penned.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.