News Update

Manish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
EOUs - to Bond, or de-Bond!

MARCH 08, 2018

By Anupama Ravindran, Advocate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Bangalore

CHAPTER 6 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 (FTP) covers schemes regarding EOUs, EHTPs, STPs and BTPs. The policy is enabled by Notification No. 52/2003-Cus dated 31-03-2003 for import of raw materials, capital goods etc. by the said units.

Subsequent to the roll out of GST, Notification No. 52/2003-Cus which enabled duty free import of goods for EOU was amended by Notification No. 78/2017-Cus dated 13-10-2017 exempting IGST on imports. However, the exemption is available under the said Notification only up to 01-04-2018.

With regard to domestic procurement, Notification No. 48/2017-CT read with 49/2017-CT, both dated 18-10-2017 provides that the domestic supplies which amount to deemed exports, refund of GST can be claimed by either supplier or recipient.

With the impending withdrawal of IGST exemption on import of goods by EOUs, companies have to consider the pros and cons of continuing to be under the EOU scheme or to come out of the scheme and become a normal DTA unit.

If a company considers converting itself from EOU to DTA, it may check the availability of BCD exemption under a Customs Notification for their regular import of raw materials/ specific business transaction. If it is available, the business is akin to an EOU and hence they can decide to come out of EOU scheme as DTA business will have less compliance issues.

Alternatively, after converting to DTA, the DTA can import good son payment of BCD and IGST. Credit of IGST is available to such companies. When goods are exported, the companies can seek drawback of the Customs component under Section 74 or Section 75 of the Customs Act and seek refund of IGST paid on goods or refund of accumulated ITC under Section 54 of the CGST Act, subject to conditions and limitations. The DTA unit can, therefore, effectively neutralize the cost of duties, or reclaim duties and taxes paid. Further, Merchandise Exports from India Scheme benefit may also be claimed as per the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Foreign Trade Policy.

If an EOU, dealing with export of services, converts to DTA unit, the said DTA unit can seek refund of IGST paid on export of Service or refund of accumulated ITC under Section 54 of the CGST Act on export of services, subject to conditions and limitations Additionally, Service Export from India Scheme benefit can be claimed by the DTAs, unlike EOUs. EOUs are not eligible for SEIS benefit, as per Foreign Trade Policy Para 3.10 read with Appendix 3D.

The MEIS and SEIS rate schedules are primarily between 3% and 5% of the realised FOB value of exports in free foreign exchange or on FOB value of exports as given in the Shipping Bills in freely convertible foreign currencies, whichever is less.

Based on the benefits available to DTA, EOUs may find the current time appropriate to measure the cost of compliance in an EOU as compared to the benefits of operating in DTA.

For exiting from EOU scheme, the EOUs are required to de-bond their goods which were imported/procured duty free under the EOU scheme.

EOUs are currently not bonded areas in furtherance of Notification No. 44/2016-Customs and Circular No. 35/2016-Cus dated 29 July 2016. After the said notification, EOUs are importing goods under Bill of Entry for Home Consumption. According to Para 6.18(a) of the FTP, exit from EOU scheme may be done with approval of DC, and such exit shall be subject to payment of applicable Customs duties, IGST and compensation cess as applicable.

Post de-bonding, mechanism to take input tax credit of IGST paid is not provided under the GST law. Under GST law, challan is not a document under which an assessee can take credit. Prior to the Circular 35/2016-Cus and Notification No. 44/2016-Cus, EOUs imported goods on Bill of Entry for Warehousing, and de-bonded on filing Bill of Entry for home consumption and payment of duties. Cenvat Credit of duties paid was available on filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption.

In the current scenario, EOUs are importing goods on filing Bill of Entry for Home Consumption. Therefore, while de-bonding the goods, payment of customs duty, IGST and compensation cess is under manual mode by way of challan.

Then the issue is how will input tax credit of IGST paid be taken? Rule 36 of the CGST Rules states that credit can be taken on invoice, debit note, Bill of Entry, or an ISD invoice. Since the de-bonding is paid under challan, then which is the appropriate document to take credit of such duty paid.

We may contemplate using a challan for payment of BCD, and using a self-invoice under CGST Act for payment of IGST and for taking credit of the same. This mechanism is only a work around and has not been prescribed under the law.

However, I suppose the industry will most certainly opine that they will take credit today, and argue at a later point of time about correctness of mechanisms of taking credit. After all, we have a history of decisions of tax tribunals favouring the assessee regarding taking input tax credit when they have paid duty.

Perhaps the above issues may get shelved for the time being in case the exemption under notification 78/2017-Cus is extended for a further period!

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.