News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Reduced rate of GST on construction service

MARCH 20, 2018

By Kundan Kumar

"HOUSING for all" is an initiative of our Hon'ble Prime Minister. To provide impetus to the same, the Government targets to provide 20 million affordable houses to the urban poor by 31st March 2022 under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.

"Affordable homes" as a concept has been rolled out to ensure that low cost houses are available to the people belonging to lower income group. Various schemes have been rolled out by the Government to provide impetus to the above objective.

One such incentive introduced by the Government includes provision of interest subsidy, commonly known as Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme ("CLSS") wherein subsidized rate of interest is charged by banks and financial institutions, when such loan is procured for the purpose of purchase, construction, extension and improvement of house. The benefit of such scheme can be availed by Economically Weaker Section (EWS), Lower Income Group (LIG) and Middle-Income Group as defined therein, subject to fulfilment of conditions provided under the above scheme.

Accordingly, the Government has tried to reduce the overall cost of home by providing various incentives, and thereby encouraging people to buy homes.

It may be noted that one of the major components in any transaction which increases the overall cost of a transaction has been tax, and such tax is leviable on construction services provided by developers.

In the earlier regime of Indirect Tax, service tax as well as VAT were leviable on construction service provided to the buyers when the developer used to enter into an agreement with buyer for sale of flat/unit prior to receipt of completion certificate from the authority concerned.

With the introduction of GST, the above taxes got subsumed under GST, and presently, GST is leviable on construction services provided to buyers. Although, the overall impact of GST has been positive for real estate industry still it is finding its feet. At present, the construction services provided by developer attracts levy of GST at the rate of 12% which adds substantial value to the cost of homes.

In order to reduce the cost of flat and incentivize the people to purchase flat, the Government on the recommendation of GST Council has issued Notification for reducing the rate of GST leviable on construction service provided by developer to persons eligible for CLSS scheme.

Accordingly, vide Notification No. 01/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25th January 2018, the Government has amended Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) whereby a new clause (db) has been inserted in item (iv) against serial number 3, in column 3 which has been reproduced below:

"a civil structure or any other original works pertaining to the "houses constructed or acquired under the Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme for Economically Weaker Section (EWS)/ Lower Income Group (LIG)/ Middle Income Group-1 (MlG-1)/ Middle Income Group-2 (MlG-2)" under the Housing for All (Urban) Mission/ Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban)"

However, the above clause has been introduced under item (iv) against serial number 3 which provides the rate of GST leviable on works contract service provided by the supplier of service. Hence, a doubt may arise whether the said rate of GST is leviable on construction service provided by the developer or on works contract service provided by the contractors.

From the plain reading of the above clause being placed under works contract category, it may be inferred that such rate is applicable for the works contract service provided by the contractors and, therefore, GST at the rate of 12% shall be leviable on the said service. Accordingly, the developer would not be eligible to charge reduced rate of GST at the rate of 8% on the construction service after claiming deduction of 1/3 rd of amount charged from the customers towards the value of land.

However, Paragraph 2 of Notification No. 11/2017-central Tax (Rate) as amended by above Notification inter-alia provides that the value of supply of above service provided to buyers eligible for CLSS scheme which involves transfer of land or undivided share of land, shall be total amount charged for such supply less the value of land which shall be deemed to 1/3 rd of total consideration charged. Effectively, the value of supply shall be taken as 2/3 rd of the consideration charged from the buyers for such supply.

On a conjoint reading of the above clauses, it can be understood that reduced rate of GST is applicable on construction service provided by developer to buyers who are eligible for CLSS scheme.

The same is also substantiated by Press Release dated 22nd January 2018 issued by CBEC wherein it has been clarified that reduced rate of GST at the rate of 8% (after claiming 1/3 rd deduction) shall be leviable on construction service provided to buyers who are eligible to avail benefits under CLSS scheme.

Therefore, GST at the rate of 8% shall be leviable on the entire consideration received from the buyers for provision of construction services subject to a condition that the buyer is eligible to avail benefit of CLSS scheme.

At this juncture, attention may also be invited to recent Press Release dated 7th February 2018 issued by Government wherein it has been advised that developers/builders should not charge GST from the customers of Affordable Group Housing and those availing benefit of CLSS scheme.

However, it may be noted that the press release further stipulates that developer can recover GST from the buyers of flats if he recalibrates the cost of the flat after factoring in the full ITC available in the GST regime and reduces the ex-GST price of flats.

Accordingly, it can be inferred that the above Press Release, per se , does not bar the developer or builder from charging GST, if the developer or builder has passed or intends to pass benefit of input tax credit to the buyers. Further, the GST law itself does not bar recovery of GST from the customer.

In nutshell, it can be said that it is a good initiative of the Government to levy concessional rate of GST on construction services provided to the buyers who are eligible for CLSS scheme, which in turn will reduce the cost of affordable home.

(The author is an Associate with Lakshmikumaran& Sridharan, Attorneys, Gurgaon and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.