News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
SSO - One Establishment, Two registrations, many issues

MARCH 22, 2018

By Nipun Arora

INTRODUCTION of GST in India brought several fundamental changes in the system and procedures covering the levy and administration of indirect taxes on goods and services. The government is working round-the-clock to resolve the issues faced by the industry. However, organisations such as specialised agencies (referred as SSOs) of the United Nations Organisation and Multilateral Financial Institution and Organisations notified under the United Nations (Privileges and Immunities) Act, 1947 ('specified entities') remained unaddressed for a longer period as they were not required to obtain GSTIN number being a non-taxpayer, but a unique identity number for notified purposes and claiming refund of taxes paid on procurement of supplies by reason of Section 25(9) of CGST Act.

The specified entities enjoying special privileges remained confused regarding various issues such as where to make an application for registration as no facilities areavailable on online portal, are they required to obtain separate registration for making outward taxable supplies, are they required to make payment of tax under reverse charge against procurement of supplies which require payment of tax under reverse charge, how will they be required to make a refund application in the absence of online facility for making refund application and many more similar issues.

Finally, bringing a little relief to such entities, CBEC has issued Circular No.36/10/2018 dated 13th March 2018 addressing some of the problems faced by such specified entities and providing the window for obtaining registration and refund.

The Key highlights of the circular are as under:

1. If any entity specified under Section 25(9) is making supply of goods or services or both in the course or furtherance of business, then such entity will need to apply for GSTIN as per the provisions contained in the CGST Act read with the rules made thereunder.

2. Entities covered under clause (a) of sub-section (9) of Section 25 of the CGST Act may approach the Protocol Division, Ministry of External Affairs in this regard, who will facilitate grant of UINs in coordination with the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) and GSTN.

3. It is clarified that the facility of single UIN is optional and an entity may seek more than one UIN.

4. FORM GSTR-11 is required to be filed only for those tax periods for which refund is being claimed. In other words, if an UIN entity is not claiming refund for a particular period, it need not file return in FORM GSTR-11 for that period.

5. All the entities who have been issued UINs and are notified under Section 55 of the CGST Act will be eligible for refund of inward supply of goods or services in terms of Notification No. 16/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017 as amended.

6. FORM GSTR-11 along with FORM GST RFD-10 has to be filed separately for each of those quarters for which refund claim is being filed.

7. Entities claiming refund shall submit the duly filled in print out of FORM RFD-10 to the jurisdictional Central Tax Commissionerate. All refund claims shall be processed and sanctioned by respective Central Tax offices. In order to facilitate processing of refund claims of UIN entities, a nodal officer has been designated in each State. Application for refund claim may be submitted before the designated Central Tax nodal officers in the State in which the UIN has been obtained.

The circular contains list of nodal officers and other information which might be useful for the specified entities.

Byway of the above circular, it has been clarified that specified entities making outward taxable supplies shall be required to obtain separate registration for discharging output tax liability. Therefore, a person not having separate business vertical will be required to obtain two registrations in case of specified entities i.e. one UIN and one GSTIN for making taxable supplies thereby creating an exception to general rule.

Although the above circular is issued to provide relief to the specified entities, certain issues still need to be addressed:

1. Are specified entities required to discharge GST on reverse charge on notified supplies or situations which require payment of tax on reverse charge basis?

2. If answer to above is affirmative, how to make payment of tax in respect of such supplies using UIN?

3. The invoices issued by the suppliers require mentioning UIN for claiming refund. However, no UIN will be available in respect of supplies procured till date in the absence of registration facility. As this circular is being issued after 8 months of implementation of GST, how refund can be claimed in respect of procurements made in the past?

4. What is the recourse available for the specified entities who have outward supplies without discharging applicable GST?

5. In case the supplies are procured for official use but the same are utilised for official use as well as taxable supplies and GST is paid on taxable supplies, in such case will the entire refund of taxes paid will be available?

6. In case of reversal is required in above cases, what is computation mechanism for reversal?.

7. In case supplies are procured using UIN number, but the same is utilised for provision of outward taxable supplies, how to transfer such credit to GSTIN number for availing credit for discharging output tax liability?

The above questions / issues require to be addressed for providing relief to specified entities and for smooth implementation of GST in respect of specified entities. Obtaining separate GSTIN is set to bring additional compliance burden and may also raise disputes regarding refunds due to allocation of credit between supplies utilised in office and supplies utilised for making outward taxable supplies by such specified entities.

(The author is an Associate with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, New Delhi and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.