News Update

For rains-ravaged Kerala 'relief' calls pour in; Customs explains proceduresMultiple personality Order - Implications and way forward!Customs Brokers and their woesST - Respondent cannot take shelter under a faulty software programme when they themselves handled system - Penalty u/s 78 of FA, 1994 wrongly set aside by CESTAT: High CourtBudget Allocation of Rs 2875 Cr - CBIC not happy with trend of spending less!I-T - Once trademark acquired is used for selling products, its eligibility for depreciation cannot be questioned, simply because trademark is not put to use for manufacturing activities: HCRecasting base year for GDP - Govt mulling over various alternativesFlood-battered Kerala - Cabinet Secretary-headed NCMC calls for shifting focus on supplies of food, water, medicines, power, fuel and telecom servicesIndia successfully test-fires 'Helina', copter-based anti-tank guided missile + also test-fires guided bombs smart anti-airfield weapon systemGovt yet to firm up mind for back-casting of GDP series; Various alternatives under considerationMulti-modal transport - TIR Convention comes into forceJalandhar CGST Commissionerate is first to become e-OfficeAadhaar Regulator to launch phased introduction of face recognition features from Sept 15Walmart wraps up Flipkart acquisition formalities; Current management to run operationsFormer UN Chief Kofi Annan passes away at 80DRI, Police & para-military forces seize 78 drums of ganja, heroin & tabletsKerala CM says worst flood in 100 years; PM announces Rs 500 Cr immediate reliefWorld Humanitarian Day - UN urges global leaders to protect people caught in conflictST - Tribunal has relied upon speech of Finance Minister for holding that assessee was not liable to pay tax without discussing relevant provisions of law/notifications - Matter remanded: HCAdvance Ruling - a nightmare for taxpayers?I-T - Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv) can be claimed only to the extent of actual income and not for accumulated income: ITATSection 197 Certificate - CBDT proposes to amend Rules to make it electronicImport of Pet Coke allowed for only cement, lime kiln, calcium carbide and gasification Industries, when used as feed stock/manufacturing process on Actual User ConditionCBDT puts in abeyance controversial clauses relating to GAAR & GSTEvery 1% growth in mining industry soars up industrial production index by 1.5%, says FICCIRailways launches 'Digital Screens' at 22 Stations
 
Anomaly in explanation to Rule 43(1)(c) of CGST Rules, 2017

 

MAY 01, 2018

By V Vishwa, Chartered Accountant

SCOPE of Rule 43(1): -

Material clause under discussion is clause (c) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 43, reproduced below for reference:

(c) the amount of input tax in respect of capital goods not covered under clauses (a) and (b), denoted as 'A', shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger and the useful life of such goods shall be taken as five years from the date of the invoice for such goods:

Provided that where any capital goods earlier covered under clause (a) is subsequently covered under this clause, the value of 'A' shall be arrived at by reducing the input tax at the rate of five percentage points for every quarter or part thereof and the amount 'A' shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger;

Explanation: An item of capital goods declared under clause (a) on its receipt shall not attract the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 18, if it is subsequently covered under this clause.

In order to understand the issue, it will be beneficial to tabulate the scope of each clause in Rule 43(1):

Clause

Scope

(a)

Deals with ITC of capital goods – used/intended to be used exclusively for:

-  Non business purposes

-  Effecting exempted supplies

(b)

Deals with ITC of capital goods – used/intended to be used exclusively for:

-  Effecting taxable supplies & zero rated supplies (i.e. supplies other than exempted supplies)

(c)

Deals with ITC of capital goods not covered under clause (a) & clause (b) i.e. common capital goods, which are used for effecting both taxable supplies and exempted supplies/non-business purpose

Proviso covers movement from clause (a) to clause (c): -

Capital goods which on receipt falls under clause (a) i.e. used (for brevity henceforth used covers 'intended to be used' also) exclusively for non-business purpose or used exclusively for effecting exempt supplies is subsequently covered under clause (c) i.e. common capital goods used for taxable supplies (including zero rated supplies) as well as exempt supplies/non-business purpose, then value of common capital goods is to be arrived as per proviso to Rule 43(1)(c) after reducing the input tax at the rate of 5% for every quarter or part thereof.

Scope of explanation:

Explanation states that capital goods declared under clause (a), if it gets covered subsequently under clause (c), then the same will not attract the provisions of section 18(4) of CGST Act, 2017.

To understand this, we need to refer to section 18(4) – reproduced below:

(4) Where any registered person who has availed of input tax credit opts to pay tax under section 10 or, where the goods or services or both supplied by him become wholly exempt, he shall pay an amount, by way of debit in the electronic credit ledger or electronic cash ledger, equivalent to the credit of input tax in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock and on capital goods , reduced by such percentage points as may be prescribed, on the day immediately preceding the date of exercising of such option or, as the case may be, the date of such exemption: Provided that after payment of such amount, the balance of input tax credit, if any, lying in his electronic credit ledger shall lapse.

Section 18 (4) talks about a situation where a person deals with taxable supplies and avails input tax credit and subsequently:

-  opts to pay tax under composition scheme or

-  deals with supplies which are wholly exempt,

such registered person has to surrender the input tax on capital goods [discussion is confined to capital goods, while section deals with reversal for input also] determined as per Rule 44 of C.G.&S.T. Rules, 2017

Hence, section 18(4) covers a situation where registered person ceases to take input tax credit; whereas proviso to Rule 43(1)(c) deals a situation where:

-  capital goods exclusively used for exempt supply becomes a common capital goods or

-  capital goods exclusively used for non-business purpose is now also used for taxable supplies

requiring inclusion of such common capital goods into input tax credit mechanism.

As section 18(4) deals with exit from ITC and Rule 43(1)(c) deals with addition of the item into ITC , it is apparent that explanation never intended to refer section 18(4). In any case, section 18(4) was not attracted to the circumstances covered by Rule 43(1)(c), therefore need to state 'it is not attracted' through an explanation never arose.

If that was not the intended reference, what did explanation intend to actually refer?

Intent of Explanation:

We should have a situation where capital goods on receipt was exclusively used for effecting exempt supply; and it becomes subsequently includible in input tax credit scheme due to change.

When one traces such situation across the entire provisions of Chapter V of CGST Act, 2017 on Input Tax Credit, it can be seen that such situation is covered vide section 18(1)(d).

To appreciate this, it will be beneficial to refer to the provisions of section 18(1)(d)

(d) where an exempt supply of goods or services or both by a registered person becomes a taxable supply, such person shall be entitled to take credit of input tax in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods held in stock relatable to such exempt supply and on capital goods exclusively used for such exempt supply on the day immediately preceding the date from which such supply becomes taxable: Provided that the credit on capital goods shall be reduced by such percentage points as may be prescribed.

Section 18(1)(d) deals with a case of capital goods on receipt exclusively used for exempt supply and subsequently becomes usable for effecting taxable supply – a situation of entry into ITC.

It deals with case of clause (a) – exclusively used for exempt supplies. On exempt supply subsequently becoming taxable, there are two scenarios:

-  Scenario – I: it can fall under clause (c) – common capital goods. (or)

-  Scenario – II: it can fall under clause (b) exclusively use for taxable supplies (including zero rated supplies) or

Section 18(1)(d) enables ITC for both the scenarios, credit will be determined as per Rule 40 of C.G. & S.T. Rules 2017. As scenario-I is specifically covered by proviso to Rule 43(1)(c), through an explanation, it was intended to confine the scope of section 18(1)(d) to scenario-II alone.

Therefore, explanation intended to state that section 18(1)(d) is not attracted in case of scenario –I when there is movement from clause (a) i.e. exclusively used for exempt supplies to clause (c) i.e. common capital goods.

Explanation intended to clarify the position as under: -

Movement

Applicable provision

Scenario – I: Clause (a) to Clause (c)

Exclusively used for taxable supplies to used commonly for both taxable and exempt supplies

Proviso to Rule 43 (1)(c)

Scenario-II: Clause (a) to Clause (b)

Exclusively used for exempt supplies to exclusively used for taxable supplies

Section 18(1)(d)

Instead of referring section 18 (1) (d) , it has been mentioned in the explanation that provision of section 18 (4) shall not be attracted.

Conclusion:

In view of above, explanation should be amended as under:

Explanation: An item of capital goods declared under clause (a) on its receipt shall not attract the provisions of clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 18, if it is subsequently covered under this clause.

This is to ensure that registered person covered under section 18(1)(d) falling under scenario-I follows Rule 43(1)(c) and reverses the credit attributable to exempt supplies, as against availing credit in full, based on Rule 40.

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Anomaly in explanation to Rule 43

Good analysis.. keep it up

Posted by Ranjeet Bothra
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Legal Wrangle | GST | Episode 80

What's New

CGST Rule Notification
CGST Rate Notification
CGST Circular
IGST Rate Notification
UTGST Rate Notification
Cess Rate Notification
Income Tax Notification
Income Tax Circular
CBDT Order - IT Return  
Customs Tariff Notification
Customs NT Notification
Customs Circular
Anti Dumping Notification
Excise - Instruction  
Service Tax Circular
DGFT Notification
DGFT Public Notice
DGFT Circular
RBI Circular

TAXATION & WILDLIFE



wso shell wso shell Indoxploit Shell wso shell hacklink hacklink satışı hacklink deface mirror hacklink satış wso shell