News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST path - XLVII - GST liability of landowners under Joint Development Agreements

 

AUGUST 27, 2018

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

BE it the erstwhile Service Tax regime or the current GST regime the issue of levy of Service Tax/GST on the builders, who undertake construction on the basis of Joint Development agreement with the landowners and hand over part of the constructed area (flats are commercial area) is always marred by confusions.

In this article, another new dimension to the issue would be discussed.

Apropos to Notification 4/2018-Central Taxes (Rate) Dt. 25.01.2018, which is reproduced below.

Special procedure for payment of CGST for construction under transfer of development rights

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 148 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the following classes of registered persons, namely:-

(a) registered persons who supply development rights to a developer, builder, construction company or any other registered person against consideration, wholly or partly, in the form of construction service of complex, building or civil structure; and

(b) registered persons who supply construction service of complex, building or civil structure to supplier of development rights against consideration, wholly or partly, in the form of transfer of development rights,

as the registered persons in whose case the liability to pay central tax on supply of the said services, on the consideration received in the form of construction service referred to in clause (a) above and in the form of development rights referred to in clause (b) above, shall arise at the time when the said developer, builder, construction company or any other registered person, as the case may be, transfers possession or the right in the constructed complex, building or civil structure, to the person supplying the development rights by entering into a conveyance deed or similar instrument (for example allotment letter).

The above notification has been issued under Section 148 of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as,

148.Special procedure for certain processes. - The Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, and subject to such conditions and safeguards as may be prescribed, notify certain classes of registered persons, and the special procedures to be followed by such persons including those with regard to registration, furnishing of return, payment of tax and administration of such persons.

A reading of the above notification would reveal that for the first time, a concept of landowner providing a service of granting development rights in favour of the builder is being referred to. It has been prescribed that the landowners supplying the service of development rights to the builder and the builder supplying construction service to the landowners are liable to pay GST at the time when the possession of the constructed area meant for the landowner sis handed over the landowner, through any document. For the service provided by the landowners to the builder, by way of transfer of development right, the consideration from the builder is in the form of constructed area being handed over; and for the service of construction provided by the builder to the landowner, the consideration from the landowner is the grant of development right. A barter transaction!

Two questions arising out of the above, is as to (i) how to arrive at the value of, service provided by the landowner to the builder, in the form of grant of development right; and (ii) how to arrive at the value of service provided by builder to landowner;

Before further proceeding, it is better to understand the scheme of Joint development.

Landowners who own land and Builders who have the expertise in construction would enter into a Joint Development agreement, whereby the landowner would grant the right to the builder, to develop the property into a residential or commercial property, by obtaining all approvals. For this purpose, suitable Power of Attorney would be executed by the landowner in favour of the builder. The builder would also undertake the construction at his cost. The total constructed area, would be agreed to be shared between the landowner and builder in agreed proportion. When the builder sells his portion of constructed area, proportionate share of undivided share of land (UDS land) pertaining to such constructed area, would also be conveyed to such buyers, by the landowner. In other words, the landowner would agree to part with his ownership over the UDS land, proportionate to the builder's share of constructed area. In turn, the landowner would get his agreed share of constructed area, the UDS land pertaining to which is already owned by the landowner.

At this stage the question as to whether the landowner is providing service to the builder, in the form of transfer of development right or not, is based on the terms of the contract and has to be decided on a case to case basis. Some of the Joint Venture agreements may not envisage any such service of grant of development right by landowner to the builders, but would only for the purpose of engaging the builder for construction, on sharing of constructed area. In this article it is presumed that there is such a service by way of grant of development rights by the landowner to the builder.

The following example would further help in understanding the above.  

1

Total area of land owned by the landowner

6000 Sq. Feet

2

No of flats that could be constructed in the land, by the builder

6 flats of 2000 Sq. Feet each, totaling 12,000 Sq. Feet of constructed area

3

Ratio of share of constructed area between the landowner and builder

50 : 50

4

No. of flats for landowner

3

5

No. of flats for builder

3

6

Proportionate share of UDS land for each flat

1000 Sq. Feet (6000Sq. Feet /6 Flats)

7

The total price at which the builder sells his flat, (per flat)

Rs.8,000 per Sq. Feet, (Rs.8,000 x 2000 Sq. Feet) i.e. Rs.1,60,00,000

8

Out of the above price, the price of UDS land, as per guideline value

Rs.6,000 per Sq. Feet, i.e. 60,00,000 (Rs.6,000 x 1000 Sq. Feet)

9

Value attributable to construction.

Rs.1,00,00,000, i.e. Rs.1,60,00,000 - Rs.60,00,000 (Total price minus value of UDS land)

It may be observed from the above that when the builder sells his share of 3 flats, he would get a total price of Rs.4,80,00,000 (3 Flats x 2000 Sq. Feet each x Rs.8,000 per Sq. Feet), out of which Rs.1,80,00,000 (3 flats x 1000 Sq.Feet UDS land each x Rs.6000 Sq. Feet) towards the sale price of proportionate UDS land, which is conveyed by the landowner to the builder's buyers, as per the Joint Development agreement. This amount would be retained by the builder himself, as against the 3 flats being constructed by him for the landowner. The builder is liable to pay GST for the services provided to the landowner, on an appropriate value.

The landowner would receive 3 flats from the builder. The proportionate UDS land for these 3 flats are already owned by the landowner. The value of these 3 flats (excluding UDS land), on the basis of the value charged by the builder for similar flats from his buyers, would be Rs.3,00,00,000 (3 flats x Rs.1,00,00,000, i.e out of the total price of Rs.1,60,00,000 per flat charged by the builder, Rs.60,00,000 is towards UDS land and the balance Rs.1,00,00,000 represent the value of construction)

It may be noted that the landowner has parted with UDS land of 3000 Sq. Feet, proportionate to the 3 flats meant for the builder, valued at Rs.1,80,00,000 (3000 Sq. Feet x Rs.6,000 per Sq. Feet). In turn the landowner has received 3 flats from the builder, the value of which is Rs.3,00,00,000, as calculated above. (It may be noted that the builder charges a total price of Rs.1,60,00,000 from his buyers, out of which Rs.60,00,000 pertain to the price of the UDS land. So the balance amount of Rs.1,00,00,000 represent the value of one flat excluding UDS land, in the hands of the landowner).

So, the difference between the value of 3 flats (Rs.3,00,00,000) received by the landowner and the value of UDS land parted by the landowner (Rs.1,80,00,000), i.e. Rs.1,20,00,000 represent the value of service of transfer of development right provided / supplied by the landowner to the builder. So the landowner would be liable to pay GST on Rs.1,20,00,000 @ 18 % for the services of granting development right to the builder. Such GST is eligible for ITC in the hands of builder, as it is an input service for the taxable output services provided / supplied by the builder.

It may be noted that thus the value of service of transfer of development right provided /supplied by the landowner to the builder has to be determined on a case to case basis, by comparing the total value of flats received by the landowner, minus the value of UDS land parted with by him.

To elaborate further, the landowner, parts with UDS land pertaining to builder's share of flats (which is a transaction in immovable property) and also provides the service of transfer of development right to the builder, and in turn gets his share of constructed area. The value of landowner's share of constructed area, thus represent the value of UDS land parted by him and the value of service of transfer of development right. Thus, from the total value of constructed area received by the landowner, if the value of UDS land parted by him is reduced, the balance would represent the value of transfer of development right provided by the landowner, on which is liable to pay GST.

As a corollary, the builder has provided construction services to the landowner and in turn retaining the sale proceeds from sale of UDS land pertaining to his share of flats, which is the value on which he is liable to pay GST. i.e. the value of service provided by the builder to landowner would be Rs.1,80,00,000 i.e. sale proceeds of UDS land pertaining to builder's share of flats retained by him.

To put it simply,

(i) The builder provides service of construction to the landowner and in turn retained the sale proceeds of UDS land pertaining to his share of flats, i.e. Rs.1,80,00,000, which is the value of service provided by builder to landowner, on which the builder is liable to pay GST.

(ii) The landowner can avail ITC of this GST, if he in turn sells these flats to buyers identified by him, on payment of GST.

(iii) The landowner parts with his UDS land pertaining to builder's share of flats and also provide the service of transfer of development right to the builder and in turn gets flats worth Rs.3,00,00,000. After reducing the value of UDS land parted with by him, i.e. 1,80,00,000, the value of service of transfer of development right provided by him would be Rs.1,20,00,000, on which the landowner is liable to pay GST.

(iv) The builder can claim ITC of this service tax charged by the landowner.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Whether TDR are taxable

Sir, good article. Regarding taxability of TDR my doubt is as follows: While registering flat Builder in favour of flat buyer whether he will transfer the property rights over UDS of land either as holder of property rights or as holder of development rights? If it as holder of property rights,when he has got only development rights from LO, how can he transfer property rights over UDS of Land to the buyers of his share of flats?
I think unless such transfer of rights over UDS of land are not executed in terms of GPA, which is normally part of JDA it appears to me that right of transfer of property rights over UDS of land is through joint development agreement only , then such transfer of rights are covered under schedule III of CGST Act as sale of land which goes out of GST. Please examine

Posted by mallikarjun reddy c
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.