News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Non Filing of Income Tax Return by Due date - consequences thereof

 

SEPTEMBER 07, 2018

By Ashish Mittal, Chartered Accountant

BEFORE detailing about the consequences of filing delayed income tax return, one should understand the requirement to file return of income:

Who is required to file Income Tax Return

Every person-

a. being a company or a firm; or

b. being a person other than a company or a firm, if his total income in respect of which he is assessable under the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961 during the relevant previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax,

shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed.

Further, every company or a firm, shall furnish on or before the due date the return of income/ loss for every previous year.

Due date for filing return of income

As per explanation 2 to Section 139(1) where the assessee is other than the following:

-  Company, or

-  A Person whose accounts are required to be audited under the provisions of Income Tax Act 1961 or under any other law, or

-  Working Partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited under Income Tax law or any other law, or

-  Assessee's who is required to furnish transfer pricing report u/s 92E.

Then the due date to file return of income is 31 July. However, for Financial Year 2017-18, CBDT vide its order dated 26 July 2018 has extended the due date for filing return of income from July 31 to August 31, 2018. Hence the return of income of all assessee's who do not fall under the above categories were required to file the return of income for FY 2017-18 by 31 August 2018.

In case any person has missed filing the return of income then following are is its impact:

Belated Return

If a tax payer fails to file the return of income on or before the due date then as per Section 139(4), such tax payers can file a belated return (i.e. return being filed after due date) at any time before the end of relevant assessment year (year following the financial year) or before the completion of assessment whichever is earlier.

Eg: If Mr A, for any reason has failed to file his return for FY 2017-18 on or before August 31, 2018 then he can still file a return belated anytime on or before 31 March 2019 (ie any time before the end of relevant assessment year). However, if the Assessing Officer of Mr A has already started conducting the assessment then Mr A can file the return anytime before completion of assessment but not later than 31 March 2019.

Revision of Belated return

In case the tax payers wishes to revise its tax return which was filed belatedly, then as per the provisions of Section 139(5), a belated return can be revised any time before the end of relevant assessment year or before the completion of assessment whichever is earlier. This is applicable for Financial Years beginning from 1 April 2016

On filing of belated return following are the major consequences:

1.  Levy of Interest

As per the provisions of Section 234A of the Act, where the return of income for any assessment year is furnished after the due date or is not furnished then the assessee shall be liable to pay interest @1% for every month or part of the month commencing from the date immediately following the due date and:

a. Where the return is furnished then upto the date of furnishing the return

b. Where the return is not furnished then upto the date of completion of assessment

on the amount of tax on the total income as determined in the Intimation issued under section 143(1) and where regular assessment is made, the tax on total income as determined under such regular assessment and reduced by advance tax along with TDS/TCS.

Thus, the tax liability will go up on account of delayed return filing.

2.  Unable to Carry Forward certain Tax Losses

In case the return of income is filed late then the tax payer may not carry forward the following losses:

a. Capital Loss

b. Business loss

c. Losses from the activity of owning and maintaining race horses

Though the tax payers may not carry forward the above loss, they can determine such loss after setting off in current computation of taxable income.

Further, the loss incurred on house property and unabsorbed depreciation in case of business can be still carried forward for future set off though the return is not filed within the due date

3.  Penalty under Section 234F

This is a newly introduced provision effective from FY 2017-18 which provides that where if the Income Tax return is not filed on or before the due date then the tax payers will be required to pay penalty u/s 234F as follows:

a. Rs. 5000 if return is furnished on or before 31 December of assessment year.

Rs. 10,000 in any other case.

However, if the Total income of the tax payer does not exceeds Rs. 5 lakh then the maximum penalty payable shall be Rs. 1000.

4.  Prosecution on account of willful default

In case of any tax payer who willfully fails to furnish the return of income within the due date then the following could be the repercussion:

a. If the tax which would have been evaded if the failure was not discovered exceeds Rs 25 lakh then with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but may extend to seven years and fine

b. In any other case with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three month but may extend to 2 years and fine

However, no person shall be proceeded under this section if:

a. The return is furnished before the expiry of assessment year (i.e. year following the financial year), or

b. The tax payable by such person (other than company) on the total income determined on regular assessment as reduced by advance tax and TDS does not exceed Rs 3,000

Conclusion

Given the above implications, it would be advisable that one must file his or her return of income and pay the due taxes on or before the due date. In case, where somebody is unable to furnish his income tax return, at least the balance tax payable (if any) must be paid within due date. Where taxes are paid in full, there would be no levy of penal interest. However, other shortcomings such as no carry forward of losses, Penalty etc will still be applicable.

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.