News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Understanding GST on Affordable Housing

JANUARY 31, 2019


By Divya Avasthi

IN addition to the existing benefit of concessional GST available to low-cost houses constructed under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban), the affordable housing segment received quite a boost under GST in the past year.

In alignment with the Government's aim of achieving "Housing for all" by the year 2022, various additional tax benefits under the GST law were introduced for the affordable housing sector.

Specifically, these benefits were extended to houses constructed or acquired under the Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS) for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS); lower-income group (LIG), middle income group-1 (MIG-1) and middle-income group-2 (MIG-2) under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (Urban) and low-cost houses up to a carpet area of 60 square metres per house in a housing project that has been given infrastructure status. [1 Square Meter = 10.7639 Square feet]

In this article, we would be examining various issues concerning availment of beneficial GST rate of 12% (i.e., 8% after availing benefit of land deduction) in respect of services provided by way of construction of low-cost houses up to carpet area of 60 square metres in an "Affordable Housing project".

The relevant entry introduced with effect from 25.1.2018 in Notification No. 11/2017-CT(Rate) [Sr. no. 3(v)(da)] is reproduced below for reference:

"(da)... low-cost houses up to a carpet area of 60 square metres per house in an affordable housing project which has been given infrastructure status vide notification of Government of India, in Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs vide F. No. 13/6/2009-INF, dated the 30th March, 2017"

The above entry extends the benefit of lower rate of GST to low-cost dwelling units with carpet area up to 60 sq. m. in an "affordable housing project" The GST rate notification does not define "Affordable Housing project". It borrows the definition provided under Notification No. 13/06/2009-INF dated 30 th March, 2017 issued by the Ministry of Finance vide which infrastructure status has been given to "affordable housing projects".

Notification No. 13/06/2009-INF dated 30th March, 2017 defines "Affordable housing project" as under:

"Affordable Housing" is defined as a housing project using at least 50% of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/Floor Space Index (FSI) for dwelling units with carpet area@ of not more than 60 square meters.

Therefore, the key conditions for availing the benefit of the concessional rate are as under:

- Low cost houses up to a carpet area of 60 square metres.

- Housing Project using at least 50% of FSI/FAR for dwelling units with carpet area of not more than 60 square metres.

It should be noted that the relevant entry uses very generic terms, such as "low-cost" and "housing project". This leads to uncertainty while determining eligibility under the said entry.

The Ministry of Finance issued Circular No. 354/52/2018-TRU dated 7th May 2018 clarifying various issues regarding availability of concessional rate on affordable housing under GST.

With respect to one of the queries regarding requirement to obtain a certificate/approval for residential projects to qualify as having "infrastructure status", the circular clarified as under:

"Low cost houses up to a carpet area of 60 square metres per house in an affordable housing project, which has been given infrastructure status under Notification No. 13/06/2009 dated 30th March, 2009 of MOF (DEA), attract concessional GST of 8% (the value of undivided share of land is included in the price of the house). Whether the housing project qualifies as affordable housing project or not, shall be determined by the builder/developer as per the definition of affordable housing given in the above mentioned notification (i.e., affordable housing has been defined as a housing project using at least 50% of FAR/FSI for dwelling units with carpet area of not more than 60 sq. m.). No certificate from any authority is required."

(Emphasis supplied)

The above Circular merely clarifies that no certificate is required from any authority to claim the benefit of concessional rate in respect of affordable housing projects.

However, it does not clarify the issues which arise while interpreting the relevant entry. Let us now discuss some of these issues.

Whether houses constructed under an affordable housing project should also be "low-cost" in order to avail benefit of concessional rate?

The way in which the entry is worded, a doubt may arise as to whether the houses being "low-cost" is an additional condition for availing benefit of concessional GST rate or fulfilment of rest of the requirements mentioned in the entry would automatically mean that the condition of "low-cost" houses is fulfilled.

In other words, it is not very clear as to whether "low-cost" is an additional condition to become eligible for claiming beneficial rate of GST.

Further, the GST rate notification also does not define "low-cost" houses. The concept of "low-cost" housing is, at best, subjective. For instance, in a metro city, flats with a price of Rs. 40 lakhs to Rs. 1 crore would fall in the low or middle price bracket. Whereas in a non-metro city, flats with prices of even Rs. 25 to Rs. 50 lakhs might be considered expensive.

Typically, low cost housing has been viewed to mean housing for the economically weaker sections of the society. These days most housing projects are equipped with amenities such as swimming pool, club house, multi-level parking.

As of now, there is no clarity as to whether housing projects having such luxuries/amenities would also qualify as "affordable or low-cost" houses for the purposes of GST, if the other requirements regarding FSI consumption and carpet area of residential units are satisfied.

It is possible that the department might take a stand that merely fulfilling the definition of "affordable housing" is not enough and the houses constructed as part of the housing project should also be "low-cost" for becoming eligible for concessional rate.

What is a "project"?

The word "project" used in the entry has not been defined under the GST rate notification.

In the real estate industry, it is a common practice to undertake construction of housing projects in phases. As per the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), each phase is required to be separately registered with the Real Estate Regulation and Development Authority.

However, it is still unclear as to whether each phase of a township should be considered as a separate "project" and accordingly, beneficial rate of GST can be claimed in respect of each phase separately. In other words, there is a doubt as to whether the word "project" refers to the entire housing project or a "project" (i.e., a phase) for the purpose of RERA.

The GST notification is silent as to whether the concessional rate benefit would be available only in respect of new projects or the same is available even in respect of ongoing projects where some of the phases have already been completed.

For builders, it would certainly be beneficial to determine eligibility for concessional rate by treating each phase as a separate housing project. This would ensure that tax implications for one phase have no bearing on other phases of the housing project. It would also mean that the builders would be able to claim beneficial rate of GST in respect of ongoing projects wherein flats will be sold after 25.1.2018 as part of upcoming phases.

However, it is possible that the department may take a stand that the term "project" should be interpreted to mean the "entire project" as a whole and hence, eligibility for concessional rate should also be determined for the entire project.

In case the department takes this stand, it might create a problem for builders. The department might also deny benefit of concessional rate in respect of phases which are part of ongoing projects which had commenced prior to 25.1.2018.

Whether benefit of concessional GST rate can be claimed by sub-contractors?

The notification also does not indicate whether the contractors engaged by developers to undertake construction activity would also be eligible to claim beneficial GST rate of 12% on their services.

As a general practice in real estate sector, developers award lumpsum contracts to contractors for construction of RCC frame/structure, plinths etc. of the entire phase or building, which may comprise residential units with carpet area less than 60 square metres (i.e., eligible units) and units with carpet area more than 60 square metres.

Further, in case of lumpsum contracts, the contractors raise running bills on the developers for receiving periodical milestone payments.

In such cases, even if the project qualifies as an "affordable housing project", the contractor will face practical difficulties since there is no way of determining the actual consideration attributable to eligible residential units for claiming beneficial GST rate of 12%.

Conclusion

The introduction of concessional rate of GST for affordable housing projects is a welcome measure for the real estate sector. However, lack of clarity on the issues discussed above definitely poses difficulties for the developers in claiming the benefit of concessional GST rate.

Hopefully, the Government might clarify these issues in time and enable developers to avail the benefits intended to be extended to them by the Government.

(The author is Senior Associate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Mumbai and the views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.