News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST Path - 55 - GST & Job work under 32/97-Cus

 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

NOTIFICATION 32/1997 Cus. Dated 01.04.1997, permits import of goods without payment of customs duties, for carrying out job work and re-export of the same. Consequent to introduction of GST from 01.07.2017, the exemption under Notification 32/1997 was not extended to the IGST payable on the imported goods and hence IGST is payable even when the goods are imported for job work purposes and re-export. In this connection, the following issues are relevant.

(i) Whether GST is payable on the job charges claimed from the foreign principal?

(ii) Can the IGST paid on import of goods for job work be availed as ITC?

Whether GST is payable on the job charges claimed from the foreign principal? It may be noted that the said job work activity would be covered under Section 13 (3) (a) of the IGST Act, which is reproduced below.

13 (3) The place of supply of the following services shall be the location where the services are actually performed, namely:- (a) services supplied in respect of goods which are required to be made physically available by the recipient of services to the supplier of services, or to a person acting on behalf of the supplier of services in order to provide the services. Provided that when such services are provided from a remote location by way of electronic means, the place of supply shall be the location where goods are situated at the time of supply of services.

Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs and are exported after such repairs without being put to any use in India, other than that which is required for such repairs.

As per the above, the place of supply of service provided by the Importer / Job worker would be the location, where such services are performed, i.e. the Importer/Job worker's location, which would be in taxable territory. Hence the transaction would not amount to export of service as one of the conditions prescribed under Section 2 (6) of the IGST Act is not satisfied. Hence, the Job worker would be liable to charge GST on the job charges claimed from the foreign principal, even if such payment is received in convertible foreign exchange. Can the IGST paid on import of goods for job work be availed as ITC? The goods imported would be subjected to various job work and the resultant product, which either remains same as that of the imported goods or transformed into a different product, would be exported to the foreign principal. But it may be noted that no price for the same would be received from the foreign principal as it is their own products, returned after job work. As per Section 2 (5) of IGST Act, "export of goods means taking goods out of India to a place of outside India" and receipt of consideration is not a pre-condition to consider the transaction as export of goods. Thus the return of imported goods to the foreign principal after job work is "export of goods", which is declared as a "zero rated supply" as per Section 16 (1) of the IGST Act. Hence, the IGST paid on the import of goods for job work purpose can be availed as ITC by the importer / job worker. Such ITC can be used either

(i) for payment of any other output tax payable by the importer/ job worker; or (ii) for payment of GST on exported goods and claim of refund {under Section 16 (3) (b) of the IGST Act};

(iii) or the input tax credit can be claimed as refund {under Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act}.

In the amendments carried out to IGST Act, 2017 with effect from 01.02.2019, the second proviso under Section 13(3)(a) has been substituted as below -

Provided further that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in the case of services supplied in respect of goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs or for any other treatment or process and are exported after such repairs or treatment or process without being put to any use in India, other than that which is required for such repairs or treatment or process.

Accordingly, the place of supply of such job work services would be the location of the recipient of supply (foreign principal's location), as per Section 13(2) ibid, which is outside the taxable territory. Hence, with effect from 01.02.2019, the Importer/Job worker is not liable to pay GST on the labour charges received from the foreign principal. Insofar as the entitlement to ITC in respect of the IGST paid on imported goods, the position remains the same as explained above.

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.