News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Concept of 'declared services/supplies' diluted under GST law?

MARCH 19, 2019

By S Sivakumar, LL.B, FCA, FCS, ACSI (London), Advocate

AS TIOL readers are well aware, the Central Goods and Services (Amendment) Act, 2018 has inserted Sub-Section (1A) to Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and has also deleted Clause (d) of Section 7(1) with retrospective effect from July 1, 2017. The amended Section 7, after this and other amendments brought about to Section 7(1), reads as under:

"7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression "supply" includes–

(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business;

(b) import of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or furtherance of business and;

(c) the activities specified in Schedule I, made or agreed to be made without a consideration;

(1A) where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.

Clause (d) of Section 7(1), before being omitted by the Central Goods and Services (Amendment) Act, 2018, with retrospective effect from July 1, 2017, read as under

"7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression "supply" includes–

(d) the activities to be treated as supply of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.

The concept of a declared service/supply under the GST law, in terms of Clause (d) of Section 7(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 has been borrowed from the erstwhile service tax law, wherein, Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994 proclaimed certain transactions as 'declared services'. The title to the said Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994 read as under:

"66E. The following shall constitute declared services, namely:–"

As is known, the list of supplies listed in Schedule II to the CGST Act is very similar to the list of services listed in Section 66E of the erstwhile Finance Act, 1994. With the omission of Clause (d) of Section 7(1) and the introduction of Sub-Section (1A) to Section 7 to the CGST Act, it is clear that, for an activity or transaction to be treated as a declared supply in terms of Schedule II, it is a pre-condition that such supply or transaction should be a supply within the meaning of the amended Section 7(1). Under the service tax law, the legal view was that, with Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994 not referring to the charging Section 66B, the activities or transactions included under Section 66E were treated as services by the very fact that they were included under Section 66E. However, the GST law, for an activity or transaction to be treated as a declared supply in terms of Schedule II, the said activity or transaction has to satisfy the definition of 'supply' under Clauses (a), (b) or (c) of Section 7(1).

This is a noticeable development insofar as the concept of declaring certain specified activities or transactions as taxable supplies under the GST law.

Taking this discussion forward…..it is now possible to take a view that, that activities such as renting of immovable property included under Sl No. 5(a) of Schedule II (the constitutional challenge to the levy of service tax on renting of immovable property services is still pending in the Apex Court) do not meet the criteria laid down in Section 7(1) and consequently, cannot be treated as taxable supplies, despite being included under Schedule II. A similar view is possible in respect of levy of GST on lease of land, license to occupy land, etc., which are included under Sl.No. 2(a) of Schedule II, as these activities, per se , do not meet the criteria laid down in Section 7(1) of the CGST Act.

In my view, pure Developers who are not engaged in construction or works contract activities by themselves (having completely outsourced these activities to third party contractors) can also contend that, they are not covered by Section 7(1) and are consequently, not liable to GST, despite being listed under Schedule II.

(The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.