News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
GST - Agenda for the second year - Part 41 - GST Council Meeting - Prioritising the agenda

 

JUNE 12, 2019

By Dr G Gokul Kishore

AS per reports, GST Council will meet on 20th June. Demands and expectations dominate dailies. Though we have been discussing the agenda on changes required since September, 2018, let us discuss, in this 41st part, certain important issues which should get the attention of the GST Council this time.

E-invoice can wait - System issues need resolution on priority

E-invoice or electronic invoice which will be generated on a centralized government portal is under consideration now. The Finance Ministry is stated as batting for turnover threshold of Rs. 50 crore which means bigger taxpayers will be mandatorily required to generate such e-invoices. It may obviate the necessity of reporting outward supplies separately through GSTR-1. However, the electronic system and processes including issues relating to returns and refund are yet to settle down. Even when GSTR-2 is not in operation, GSTR-2A data is being sought to be compared with GSTR-3B in Annual Return GSTR-9. There is no clarification on how to reconcile differences between credits availed in GSTR-3B and the data reflecting in GSTR-2A. Short payment of tax can be paid through DRC-03 at the time of filing of Annual Return but it will not be correlated with such return. It is not known how it will be recognized at the back-end and how taxpayers should inform the department of such payment. All such issues need to be resolved first.

E-invoice may be a tool for plugging revenue leakage but for taxpayers the same is not a priority. They expect the GST Council to give directions to resolve all technical glitches and issues arising out of e-implementation of GST. Now that two years is almost complete, the Council should seek a report from GSTN, float a white paper on implementation including issues yet to be resolved and based on stakeholders' feedback, the system should be rejigged. GSTN has commenced providing free accounting and billing software with facility to generate returns for MSMEs with turnover upto Rs. 1.5 crore. Such processes should be publicised and awareness on use should be built. The turnover is very less, and the amendments earlier proposed to MSME Act suggested turnover upto Rs. 75 crore as small enterprises. GST Council should consider increasing the threshold to at least Rs. 10 crore for availing such free software facility.

ITC restriction - Providing option

A lower rate of tax always comes with strings attached. Prominent among them is restriction of input tax credit (ITC). Passenger transportation by railways attracts 5% GST but ITC on goods used in supplying such service cannot be utilized for paying tax on such output service. For restaurants, the ban is comprehensive i.e. credit of tax paid on both goods and services cannot be taken to the extent they are exclusively used for such services and in case of part use, proportionate credit reversal will be required. Similar condition has been placed for transportation by certain contract carriages. The latest to join this list is residential real estate sector with total restriction on ITC when 5% rate has been mandatorily fixed. We have discussed in a few parts earlier in this series about lack of option i.e. higher rate with ITC which is a deviation from the Central Excise regime. As the GST Council is meeting shortly and the restaurateurs have sought a dual rate structure - 12% with ITC and 5% without ITC, it is time serious discussions are initiated on this subject. Blocking credit can never be part of GST system for a sector as a whole.

Exemption to cross charge payment

Charging of tax on support services provided by head office of a company to its branch offices in other States is mandated by Schedule I of the CGST Act. Many in the industry are not able to reconcile such statutory position. However, after advance rulings, it appears that the department will not only implement such provision stringently but also seek inclusion of costs like salary of employees sitting in head office or corporate office. It has been highlighted earlier that norms / standards on inclusions and exclusions from taxable value in such cases should be provided. It may be prudent to consider granting exemption in such cases as the tax paid in HO will be availed as credit by the branch office in other State. Being an IGST transaction, the destination State will get its share of tax revenue but the same will be utilised by the branch office when it makes further supply thus not resulting in any revenue ultimately. Considering the talk about big data and data analytics these days, figures on tax paid on such transactions and net revenue realisation over a period of time should be analysed and decision on exemption should be taken. The forthcoming GST Council Meeting may consider recommending such exemption.

Net ITC amendment - Provide relief to past cases

GST Council in its 31 st meeting had recommended amendment to CGST Act (and SGST Acts) to the effect that interest will be payable on delayed payment of that portion of tax which is paid through electronic cash ledger. This means that interest will not be payable if sufficient ITC is available. Such amendments will be normally prospective in effect. GST Council may consider providing retrospective effect to such amendment. This may provide relief to taxpayers particularly in the light of huge interest liability as seen in the case before the Telangana High Court [Megha Engg. & Infra Ltd. v. Commissioner, - 2019-TIOL-893-HC-Telangana-GST. The rationale for such demand is that when credit is available the taxpayer could not have an intent to evade and deliberately pay lesser amount as tax.

Larger agenda to cover important issues

It will be ideal if the GST Council starts deliberating on the mega changes like bringing natural gas within GST net. Aviation Turbine Fuel is also being mentioned for such inclusion. It will be a good beginning if, in the third year of GST, such goods come within GST fold. Methodology for passing on benefits out of rate reduction or increased ITC to be compliant with anti-profiteering provisions should also be prescribed on priority. Arrest, detention and seizure of goods and conveyances, composite and mixed supplies, etc., are some of the issues which need clarity by way of circulars to be issued based on the recommendations of GST Council.

(…To be continued)

[The author is an Advocate and Joint Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, New Delhi. The views expressed are personal.]

See Part 40

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: agenda for 20th june

nicely covered the issues to be addressed by the post election first council meet.
two three things i would like to add.
1.audit as defined in sub section 13 of section 2 is ridiculous and it talks about the every kind of work including the verification investigation certification thereby leading to assessment itself.

whereas the subsection 2 of section 44 says that annual return with reco statement duly certified by a ca or cwa is required.

therein again two types of reports are desired. one by who has done the audit of the books as well along with the annual return filing and second is by the person who has not audited the annual books of accountsbut filing te annual retur and doing the 9c job.

language in both the situation is different.

i solemnly affirm like phrases are being used. why.

if u want audit then the audit report should be desired giving a view about the truth and fairness about the accounts being audited.
but in audit you are expecting auditor to certify the very correctness of the every figure and data.

this is not done in democracy.

they say if the turnover exceeds 2 cr then audited accounts are needed to be filed(under which act not clear).
point is 2 cr in 9 months of gst period or in the full 17-18 and which turn over. taxable or aggregate.compliance is always linked to tax ability its discharging etc. hence it should be taxable supply turnover only.unfortunate it is not so.also turnover in the state or on PAN india basis is also not clear. sensibly it should be in the state only when the audit report and the annual return is required state or registration wise.
please.....madam look into this


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.