News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Post Supply Discounts under GST - Oh My Dealer !

 

JULY 04, 2019

By Shashank Shekhar Gupta, Marg Tax Advisors

A recent clarification has been issued vide Circular no. 105/24/2019-GST dated June 28, 2019 aiming to clarify tax treatment of secondary or post sales discount under Goods and Services Tax regime.

The article discusses the applicable statutory provisions w.r.t post supply discounts, clarification issued vide the said circular and its possible impact on practical business scenarios.

Statutory Provision pertaining to post supply discount under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ('CGST Act')

Section 15(3)(b) of CGST Act provides as follows:

'(3) The value of the supply shall not include any discount which is given-

(a) before or at the time of the supply if such discount has been duly recorded in the invoice issued in respect of such supply; and

(b) after the supply has been effected, if-

(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and

(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the supply.

…'

The above provides that value of supply shall not include any discount which has been extended even after the supply has been put to effect, subject to the following conditions:

(a) There is a pre-existing agreement with respect to such discounts

(b) Specific linkage with relevant invoices is available; and

(b) Proportionate Input Tax Credit ('ITC') is reversed by the recipient

The said procedure is to be put to effect through issuance of credit note by the supplier to the recipient. Issuance of credit notes is provided through section 34 of CGST Act read with rule 53 of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 ('CGST Rules').

Comments:

In as much as the post supply discount adjustment is sought to be claimed by the supplier, the same can be claimed basis the above provisions. The clarification issued by the circular is to clarify aspects relating to taxability/ valuation of post supply discount related transactions. The intent of the circular does not appear to impose additional/ over-riding conditions w.r.t post supply discount which are not provided through substantive law.

Vide the said circular following three instances have been taken up for discussion i.e.:

Case 1: Post supply discount without any further obligation or action required by the dealer

Case 2: Post supply discount requiring dealer to undertake special sales drive, advertisement campaign, exhibition etc.

Case 3: Post supply discount to offer a special reduced price by the dealer to the customer to augment sales volume

Case wise clarification issued by the said circular in detail:

Case 1: Post supply discount without any further obligation or action required

Clarified:

- Discounts not to be included in the value of supply.

- Proportionate tax liability adjustment can be claimed (subject to fulfillment of conditions specified vide Section 15(3)(b) discussed supra).

Comments:

From departmental perspective, it is likely that the said case may become the gold standard for post supply discounts. Though practically it may arise in limited cases only. Such as revaluation post supply i.e. any cost adjustments identified later.

Case 2: Post supply discount requiring dealer to undertake special sales drive, advertisement campaign, exhibition etc.

Clarified:

- Undertaking such efforts would constitute a separate transaction i.e. supply of services.

- The dealer being supplier of services and amount of additional discount being the consideration for such supply.

- The dealer is required to issue invoice and charge the applicable GST.

- The recipient (manufacturer/ wholesaler) is entitled to avail ITC for such GST.

Comments:

This adds to the woes of the dealer specially for cases wherein post supply discount/ credit notes are being considered as an omnipotent tool to govern supplier-dealer relationship. If the dealer has undertaken any sales promotion activity at the behest of the supplier and the incentive has been passed on by the supplier in the form of post supply discount then there is an exposure on the dealer necessitating rectification for the past and calls for re-consideration going forward.

Case 3: Post supply discount to offer a special reduced price by the dealer to the customer to augment sales volume

Clarified:

- Such discount would represent additional consideration flowing from the supplier of goods (manufacturer/ wholesaler) to the dealer for supplies effected by the dealer to customers.

- These discounts are to be added for the purposes of deriving consideration in the hands of the dealer.

This highlights an exposure for various types of discounts extended to the dealer by the supplier. Such as on account of stock clearances, season end sales, stocks approaching expiry etc. All of them can be argued to be in the nature of special reduced value as well as for the purpose of augmenting sales volume.

Moreover, for such transactions it has also been clarified that no ITC for additional tax paid will be available to the customer (as amount is being effectively paid by the supplier to the dealer and not by the customer). This is further bound to complicate such transactions and hence calls for immediate re-structuring. As for the past necessary rectification procedures are required to be undertaken.

Treatment of target-based discounts:

Three aspects which have been specifically clarified by the circular have been discussed above. However, one major aspect which has not been specifically clarified is Target based discount. For e.g. X Ltd is a wholesaler/ manufacturer of bottled beverages with Y Ltd being its dealer for Delhi Territory. X Ltd agrees to allow 10 percent additional discount to Y Ltd on achieving target of INR 1 crores in sales. To maximize its sales, Y Ltd uniformly starts undertaking sales at 10 percent standard discount. Whereby on achieving the said sales target Y Ltd claims the discount from X Ltd. X Ltd passes on this discount through issuance of credit note.

In such case, let us presume that all the conditions specified vide Section 15(3)(b) (discussed supra) are fulfilled. Hence, the post supply discount (sans the circular) should be allowable.

Let us now, compare the said example with the cases which have been clarified vide the circular. Para 3 discusses post supply discount without any further obligation or action at the dealer's end. In our above example, the post supply discount is conditioned with a rider of achieving a specified sales target. Hence, it fails the test set by para 3.

Moreover, the said example also does not get covered under the other two cases as they are specific to cases being - additional activity or discount at the behest of the supplier whereas in our example the discount has been extended voluntarily by the dealer. Therefore, the post supply discount should remain allowable for the given example. The answer should remain the same if in lieu of discount it is any additional activity undertaken by the dealer voluntarily to promote sales.

Majorly the implications arising out of the circular have been cast in the hands of the dealer. A segment which functions through download of approach formulated by the supplier. Inasmuch as the dealer is liable to be aware and cautious, it is equally an obligation on the supplier to ensure a trouble-free supply chain. Hence, it is important to collectively re-look into the present business positions and iterate accordingly. The circular subtly points at the vastness of territories un-defined within the domain of supply. It also causes to bring forth the haunts of past w.r.t valuation. The circular, in all probability, also gives teeth to the department which is already starving from lower than expected revenue collection under the GST regime.

(Anjali Aggarwal, Associate also shared her inputs for the article. The views expressed are strictly personal)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.