News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Refund under GST- Interplay of Glitches and Glory

 

JULY 22, 2019

By Debasish Bandyopadhyay

SECTION 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 provides for a refund in case of an inverted duty structure in the GST regime. The said arrangement for refund arising out of inverted duty structure resulting into accumulation of ITC and subsequent blockage of working capital, have widely been appreciated by the trade and industry, however, the process for filing the said refund claim electronically in the GST portal is proving to be nothing short of a harrowing experience for the related stakeholders.

At the outset, let us have a look at, how the Finance Minister started her Union Budget - 2019-20 proposals on Indirect Taxes;

"Now coming to Indirect Tax, we are aware that the landscape has changed significantly with implementation of GST. In every sense, this has been a monumental reform. Centre and States coming together and agreeing to pool in their sovereign power of taxation for common good of the country was unprecedented. 17 taxes and 13 cesses became one tax. Multitude of rates instantly became four. Almost all commodities saw rate reduction. Tens of returns were replaced by one. Taxpayer's interface with tax departments got reduced. Border checks got eliminated. Goods started moving freely across states, which saved time and energy. A truck started doing two trips in the same time in which it was doing one. Thus, dream of one nation, one tax, one market was realised. The GST Council deserves all the credit for this."

It may appear from the above that lives of thousands of Indians had been meaningfully changed and the long cherished dream of 'one nation, one tax' was realised through the implementation of GST in the country. The GST Council was deservedly credited for the same. However, there is a different story altogether smouldering in the hearts of thousands of taxpayers who are to seek legitimate refunds from the department on account of inverted duty structure or otherwise as prescribed under the law.

In terms of the relevant provisions under the GST laws, the application for filing of refund claim is required to be made in Form GST RFD-01A along with invoice wise details of inward and outward supplies which are to be furnished electronically in Statement 01A. The said Statement 01A uploaded by the taxpayer is to be validated by the system from the invoice data available with the GSTN database. The details of outward supplies are validated from the data furnished in the GSTR-1 by the taxpayer and the details of inward supplies are validated from the GSTR-1 furnished by the persons from whom the taxpayer has procured the inward supplies or their vendors.

It is pertinent to note that there is no provision under the law for filing of such refund claim manually. In many cases, the taxpayers are facing huge difficulty in uploading the Statement-01A in the GSTN portal at the time of filing of refund application due to technical glitches at the GSTN portal. It is important to highlight that the Statement-01A is required to be uploaded by the applicant in json file format which is accepted by the GSTN portal with each file having a maximum capacity of 10,000 entries. However, in some cases, while filing the refund application for a whole year, especially for the manufacturer-retailers having huge data, there may be many json files to be generated for uploading at the portal. However, at the time of uploading the same in the GSTN portal, the portal is accepting upto a maximum of 20-25 json files after which it is automatically logging the applicant out from the registered portal. The portal is not allowing to upload further json files after this limit. The said technical issue has been persistent for a long time and has resulted into non-filing of legitimate refund claims in many cases.

Now, coming to the process for resolution of the said technical glitches, here it is important to note that one such applicant had approached the jurisdictional authority many times to get a solution in this regard. Further, the applicant had also visited the local GST IT Cell, GST Seva Kendra and raised the issue at GSTN Helpdesk multiple times. Unfortunately, the GSTN Helpdesk has left the assessee helpless by delivering a simple message that the issue has been identified and the team is working on it, the solution for the same is still a far cry even after the considerable period of time from the issue being raised by the assessee. Owing to the aforesaid glitches, the manufacturers with inverted duty structure in production and having voluminous data against their inward and outward supplies are facing unjustifiable difficulty in filing refund claim in the GSTN Portal due to such unwarranted and impractical restrictions. It is also important to note that since there is no sight of solution for such glitches, the refund claim for the month July-2017 is under the spell of uncertainty, since the time limitation for filing refund claim under the GST law is inching closer. It is unfortunate that even after completion of two years of GST implementation in the country, taxpayers have been made to run from pillar to post in order to resolve a basic technical problem like this.

In pursuance to the discussion made above, some significant questions may arise considering the aforesaid impasse, whether the assessee is allowed to file refund claim manually at this point? Can the refund claim be filed without uploading the Statement-01A electronically? Is the jurisdictional officer empowered to accept Statement-01A and related documents manually after filing the claim through portal without uploading the said Statement? In case, the issue is not resolved within the stipulated timeline, does the assessee have to file a writ petition before the jurisdictional High Court for accepting the refund claim manually?

The answer to the aforesaid questions are predictably unpredictable. The most enduring takeaway from the above discussion on the architecture of GSTN Portal is that there is a deep-seated uncertainty which can throw surprising shocks to the aspirations of the taxpayers at any point of time. Here, it is pertinent to recall that t he FM has pointed out in her budget speech that Centre and States proactively worked to resolve many issues. The larger point is whether the said issues are resolved proactively or reactively! In the event of any glitches or technical issues, many a times it has been observed that GSTN IT Cell has become unresponsive and clueless. However, it is undeniable fact and a matter of glory for the tax administration of the country that top echelons of the Central and State Governments have been proactive all along in their response to the apprehensions and difficulties voiced by the trade and industry. Further, most of the time, genuine efforts are being made to alleviate the pain of stakeholders in order to ensure that GST becomes a real success and the driver of growth for the Indian economy.

It appears from the above that technical issues in GSTN Portal have been a huge spoilsport in the entire GST eco-system impacting all aspects of the business including the working capital blockage on account of accumulation of ITC due to inverted duty structure and holding up of related refund claims. It is high time that the GST Council takes necessary steps in order to make GSTN Portal more robust and trustworthy before implementing fully automated GST refund module as promised by the FM in her budget speech. Meanwhile, the issues as discussed supra in respect of uploading Statement-01A for filing refund claim under inverted duty structure and related json file restrictions in the GSTN Portal, must be resolved on an urgent basis. It is hoped that the GST Council shall intervene in time to end the uncertainty and unnecessary disruptions in the trade so as to take such revolutionary tax reform on the path of real glory.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.