News Update

Manish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Department appeal - Eligibility under SVLDRS, 2019 is fine, but what is the relief

NOVEMBER 12, 2019

By Abhishek Panicker

THE last question in the second set of FAQs issued in September reads -

Q.60 The duty demand in an SCN issued to me was dropped by the adjudicating authority. However, the department has filed an appeal. I have not filed any appeal in the matter. Will this case by eligible under the Scheme.

Ans. Yes.

The FAQ brought out in October rephrases the question thus -

Q.55 The duty demand in an SCN issued to me was dropped by the adjudicating authority. However, the department has filed an appeal. I have not filed any appeal in the matter. Will this case by eligible under the Scheme.

Ans. Yes. You can file a declaration with regard to this appeal if you are willing to pay the tax dues as calculated under the Scheme for bringing the matter to closure. Section 124(1)(a) covers 'one or more appeals' arising out of an SCN. Such appeals can be either filed by the party or the department.

Kindly ignore the typo. By the way, the "by" should be "be".

Be that as it may, what is apparent is that even in those cases where the department has gone in appeal, the assessee can opt for the Scheme.

The first question that arises is as to whether it would be prudent to consider this clarification as not restricting to SCN and its dropping but also extend to even those cases where the assessee won, whether in whole or part, before the Commissioner(A) or CESTAT or the High Court and the department being aggrieved has filed an appeal before the higher authority.

The answer presumably is in the affirmative in view of the following Illustration appearing in Section 123(a) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 -

Illustration 3:  The show cause notice to a declarant was for an amount of duty of Rs.1000 and an amount of penalty of Rs.100. The order was for an amount of duty of Rs. 900 and penalty of Rs. 90. The declarant files an appeal against this order of determination. The departmental appeal is for an amount of duty of Rs. 100 and penalty of Rs. 10. The amount of duty which is being disputed is Rs. 900 plus Rs. 100 i.e Rs. 1000 and hence tax dues are Rs. 1000.

Now, the next question would be the extent of relief that would be available to the assessee.

Let us refer to the sections which can throw light on this issue.

Section 124(1) reads -

124. (1) Subject to the conditions specified in sub-section (2), the relief available to a declarant under this Scheme shall be calculated as follows:-

(a) where the tax dues are relatable to a show cause notice or one or more appeals arising out of such notice which is pending as on the 30th day of June, 2019, and if the amount of duty is,-

(i) rupees fifty lakhs or less, then, seventy per cent. of the tax dues;

(ii) more than rupees fifty lakhs, then, fifty per cent. of the tax dues;

[Emphasis supplied]

The words 'tax dues' is defined in section 123.

Section 123(a) reads -

For the purposes of the Scheme, "tax dues" means-

(a) where-

(i) a single appeal arising out of an order is pending as on the 30th day of June, 2019 before the appellate forum, the total amount of duty which is being disputed in the said appeal;

(ii) more than one appeal arising out of an order, one by the declarant and the other being a departmental appeal, which are pending as on the 30th day of June, 2019 before the appellate forum, the sum of the amount of duty which is being disputed by the declarant in his appeal and the amount of duty being disputed in the departmental appeal:

[Emphasis supplied]

So, in cases of the above kind given in the Illustration 3 and the one visualised in the FAQ(s) reproduced above, the declarant would be entitled to relief as provided in section 124(1)(a) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 in view of s.123(a) above.

However, this does not solve the issue entirely.

Consider a case where a demand was made of Rs.10 lakhs against the assessee. The original authority confirmed a part demand of Rs.5 lakhs and dropped the remaining.

The assessee accepted the confirmation and did not challenge the order.

However, the department was aggrieved with the dropped portion of the demand and went in appeal.

The assessee opts to file a declaration under the SVLDRS, 2019 in respect of the demand confirmed (and which he has accepted by not choosing to file further appeal).

The said amount would acquire the status of "arrears" as defined in section 121(c) [reproduced below] -

c) "amount in arrears" means the amount of duty which is recoverable as arrears of duty under the indirect tax enactment, on account of-

(i) no appeal having been filed by the declarant against an order or an order in appeal before expiry of the period of time for filing appeal; or

(ii) an order in appeal relating to the declarant attaining finality; or

(iii) the declarant having filed a return under the indirect tax enactment on or before the 30th day of June, 2019, wherein he has admitted a tax liability but not paid it;

The said "arrears" also partake the form of "tax dues" in view of section 123(e) which reads -

123. For the purposes of the Scheme, "tax dues" means-

(e) where an amount in arrears relating to the declarant is due, the amount in arrears.

Since the said amount of confirmed demand acquires the status of "arrears", the declarant would be entitled to relief as computed in section 124(1)(c) i.e. -

(c) where the tax dues are relatable to an amount in arrears and,-

(i) the amount of duty is, rupees fifty lakhs or less, then, sixty per cent. of the tax dues;

(ii) the amount of duty is more than rupees fifty lakhs, then, forty per cent. of the tax dues;

However, what would be the fate of the amount in respect of which the department has gone into appeal is the question that begs for an answer.

Obviously, the same cannot be treated as 'arrears' for the assessee and one may be required to again revert to section 123 which stipulates -

123. For the purposes of the Scheme, "tax dues" means-

(a) where -

(i) a single appeal arising out of an order is pending as on the 30th day of June, 2019 before the appellate forum, the total amount of duty which is being disputed in the said appeal;

And since the said amount in the departmental appeal is covered under the above provision, the relief against the said amount is required to be computed by applying section 124(1)(a) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, that is, -

…if the amount of duty is,-

(i) rupees fifty lakhs or less, then, seventy per cent. of the tax dues;

(ii) more than rupees fifty lakhs, then, fifty per cent. of the tax dues;

We, therefore, have a strange scenario wherein for the relief to be computed in respect of the "arrears" portion we need to apply s.124(1)(c) and in respect of the duty demand for which the department has gone into appeal, the relief is required to be computed by applying section 124(1)(a) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

But will all this computational jigsaw puzzles be left to the website designed for SVLDRS and its computing skills courtesy Artificial Intelligence (AI) or whether the wisdom of the designated committee be requisitioned, is the moot question?

Above all, what use are the monetary limits laid down for the appeals filed by the department if the quantum of duty involved in such appeals are to be reckoned for arriving at the figure of tax dues?

It would be in the interest of all the assessees applying for the SVLDRS that the CBIC first needs to ensure that its slate of pending appeals is wiped clean as far as possible by applying its Instruction dated 22 nd August 2019.

We are already in possession of a combined 165 FAQs and three Board Circulars and hope that the next set of FAQs or Circular addressing the above issue is also around the corner.

In parting: It is reported that declarations amounting to Rs.6000 crore have been received so far. And only fifty more days to go before the Scheme ends…

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.