News Update

Manish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Twenty Percent Credit - Eighty Percent Confusion

NOVEMBER 13, 2019

By Vijay Kumar

IN order to nudge taxpayers to timely file their statement of outward supplies, the GST Council in its meeting held on September 20th recommended imposition of restrictions on availment of input tax credit by the recipients in cases where details of outward supplies are not furnished by the suppliers in the statement under section 37 of the CGST Act, 2017.

The Government by its Notification No. 49/2019-Central Tax , dated 09.10.2019 inserted a new Sub-rule (4) to Rule 36 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, which read as:

"(4) Input tax credit to be availed by a registered person in respect of invoices or debit notes, the details of which have not been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37, shall not exceed 20 per cent. of the eligible credit available in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37."

This left many taxpayers and consultants and of course, the knowledgeable officers in serious confusion as to the implications.

The process of tax law-making starts with a confusion with absolutely no clarity on what to tax and how to tax. Then they get this legislation passed by Parliament, when it gets the sanctity of legislative enactment. The faulty law prepared by some junior officers in the Revenue Department goes to Parliament and comes out as the revered law of the land. When doubts arise, the courts interpret what the legislative intention was. Nobody asks the under-secretary who prepared the law as to what he was up to, if he is around. Most likely, by this time he would be trying to break his head to understand what he originally meant, when he was writing laws for the country. And if you find fault with him, his boss will get angry with you.

But then, when laws are confusing, they always come out with circulars clarifying what they originally meant. Only the clarifications are more confusing than the original confusion.

Now, in this situation, they have limited the amount of input tax credit that a taxpayer can avail (not withstanding what availment is), if his supplier has not uploaded the invoice. Is the government competent to impose such restrictions? That we will decide after twenty years, when we can analyse the intention of the legislation. But as of now, the credit is restricted to twenty percent. Twenty percent of what? To understand that you need to understand a little bit of mathematics, economics, accounting, psychology and a few computer programmes, to start with.

Any way the nice Board has come out with a circular clarifying all the doubts on this restricted twenty percent credit.

First of all, the Board clarifies that it is not responsible for calculating this twenty percent, nor will the portal do it for you. You have to do it yourself - that is called self-assessment and if you don't do it properly, you will have to face the music - loud and clear.

For the sake of clarity, they have liberally considered that this restriction will not have retrospective effect and will be applicable only on the credits taken after 09.10.2019.

Further, the restriction imposed is not supplier wise. The credit available under sub-rule (4) of rule 36 is linked to total eligible credit from all suppliers against all supplies whose details have been uploaded by the suppliers.

Here is a simple clarification:

The amount of input tax credit in respect of the invoices/debit notes whose details have not been uploaded by the suppliers shall not exceed 20% of the eligible input tax credit available to the recipient in respect of invoices or debit notes the details of which have been uploaded by the suppliers under sub-section (1) of section 37 as on the due date of filing of the returns in FORM GSTR-1 of the suppliers for the said tax period. The taxpayer may have to ascertain the same from his auto populated FORM GSTR 2A as available on the due date of filing of FORM GSTR-1 under sub-section (1) of section 37.

For other such simple and easy clarifications, please read the Circular No. 123/42/2019- GST, dated 11th November, 2019 a few times and if you don't understand and if you believe in God, hire God as your tax consultant and leave the rest of the story to Him.

The Synergy Conference:

The 1st full day National conference of Commissioners of State Tax (CCT) and zonal Chief Commissioners/Director Generals of Central Tax is scheduled to be held on 25th November, 2019 (Monday) under chairmanship of the Dr. Ajay Bhushan Pandey, Union Revenue Secretary.

A letter from a Deputy Commissioner in the GST Council states,

As this conference is being organized to have synergy between States and Central tax administration and to share knowledge and best practices, all Commissioners of State Tax and all Chief Commissioners/Director Generals of Central Tax are requested to personally attend this conference.

The Dictionary defines 'synergy' as

The combined power of a group of things when they are working together that is greater than the total power achieved by each working separately.

The combined power, profits, etc. that can be achieved by two organizations or groups of people working together rather than separately.

Can't we simply do away with these different GSTs and have just one GST and no need of synergy?

Poor quality of website will kill SVLDRS

Mr. Gururaj wrote in our Message Board,

The website of SVLDRS is abominable. If anything works right on the website, it is by divine grace. Starting with logging in, everything is a problem. When SVLDR3 or SVLDR 2 are issued, the declarant is not informed. The declarant or his counsel has to check almost on daily basis. Some screens show download of forms. When the download usually fails. There is a Save button on SVLDR 1 screen, but when clicked it gives message "No permission"! Without doubt, this website alone will kill the scheme. The scheme has another two months life. If the website is not improved on war footing, the scheme will eventually fail, though the scheme itself is mostly fair.

To add a few more, when you finally want to pay, you can't generate the challan and if you generate the challan and click "Make Payment", the site will tell you, "no record found". If you try to call them up on the helpdesk, you will find a poor helpless person, with little knowledge of English, simply knowing not what to do to solve your problem. I know a taxpayer who has miraculously reached the last stage of Vishwas. All that he has to do is pay the money and he is willing to pay and for the last ten days he has been frantically trying to make the payment, but for love or money he cannot generate that magic number which will allow him to make payment in the Bank. It really requires great talent to create such a pathetic portal. The Government should do something urgently to set right things; otherwise this scheme will also blossom into a good and simple scheme - which will end in a disaster.

Until next week


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Twenty Percent Credit- 800 percent confusion

Well,

First of all i would need to applaud your style of drafting.Well thats from the bottom of the heart of many tax consultants.

Thanks, for making us belief that the circular is actually faulty with no intent.

Posted by Praveen Kashyap
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.