News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST on renting of motor vehicle - Welcome clarification

JANUARY 07, 2020

By Manoj Sharma, AVP (Commercial), Greenlam Industries Ltd.

CBIC has issued Notification No. 29/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31st December 2019 to make amendments in the notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June, 2017 and followed it with and CBIC Circular No. 130/49/2019-GST.

Taxpayers have following alternatives available while making payment of GST on supply of service by way of renting of any motor vehicle, which is designed to carry passengers and where the cost of fuel is included in the consideration:

i) GST @ 5% with limited Input Tax Credit of input services in the same line of business, if any.

ii) GST @ 12% with full Input Tax Credit.

Notification No. 22/2019-Central Tax dated September 30, 2019 introduced Reverse charge on rent-a-cab services only in case of the first of the above options, where the suppliers were paying GST @ 5%, where recipient of the service is a body corporate.

Reverse charge GST was not applicable in case for suppliers paying GST @12% with full ITC. This was to enable them to continue to avail ITC or else, reverse charge would have blocked the ITC chain for such suppliers.

Subsequently, various representations were submitted stating that when a service is covered by reverse charge mechanism, GST should be paid by the service recipient and not by the supplier. Clarification was requested on the original entry "any person other than a body corporate, paying central tax at the rate of 2.5%".

Above circular clarifies the following:

A supplier providing services to a recipient who is not a body corporate will be liable to pay GST @ 5% on the services supplied as this will not be covered under reverse charge.

Therefore, the reverse charge entry has been further amended for the sake of greater clarity to state that in case of service by way of renting of any motor vehicle (designed to carry passengers) where the cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged from the service recipient, reverse charge shall be applicable, provided that the supplier is fulfilling all the following conditions:

(a) The suppler is other than a body-corporate;

(b) The supplier does not issue an invoice charging GST @12% (6% CGST + 6% SGST) to the service recipient; and

(c) The supplier supplies the services to a body corporate.

For ready reference, extracts of both the original and amended entries have been reproduced (deletions in strike through, and additions in bold italics):

Entry
Category of supply of services
Supplier of service
Recipient of service
Original entry
Services provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle provided to a body corporate.
Any person other than a body corporate, paying central tax at the rate of 2.5% on renting of motor vehicles with input tax credit only of input service in the same line of business
Any body corporate located in the taxable territory
Amended entry [Notification No. 29/2019- Central Tax (Rate)], 31 December, 2019
Services provided by way of renting of any motor vehicle designed to carry passengers where the cost of fuel is included in the consideration charged from the service recipient , provided to a body corporate.
Any person, other than a body corporate who supplies the service to a body corporate and does not issue an invoice charging central tax at the rate of 6 per cent. to the service recipient
Any body corporate located in the taxable territory

The Circular thankfully also clarifies that the present amendment is merely clarificatory in nature and, therefore, the above clarification shall be applicable from the initial date of implementation of RCM on the above service i.e. for the period from 1 October 2019 onwards.

The above notification and circular together puts to rest the doubts and concerns of the taxpayers.

[The author is also Convener Taxation, Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Industrial Association, Himachal Pradesh (BBNIA). The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: GST on renting of motor vehicle

What if service is provided by URD to Body corporate. is that like earlier it was not covered under RCM and now fall into RCM with change of wording in notification.

Earlier notification has the word "paying 2.50%" now it is "not paying 6%"


Posted by Jaiprakash Ruia
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.