News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
COVID-19 and GST Council - Need to prescribe procedure during times of an epidemic/pandemic

 

MARCH 31, 2020

By Pritam Mahure, CA

ON 24th March 2020, the Union Finance Minister announced a relief package including certain procedural concessions for GST payers. However, this Press Release (dated 24th March 2020) came after the GSTR-3B due date itself (as due date for filing GSTR-3B for February 2020 was 20th March 2020 for large taxpayers and 22 nd or 24th March 2020 for small taxpayers).

It may be noted that the aforesaid relief (dated 24th March 2020) came with a rider which reads - "6. Necessary legal circulars and legislative amendments to give effect to the aforesaid GST relief shall follow with the approval of GST Council."

Why GST payers are still awaiting circulars and legislative amendments?

However, even after a week the GST payers are awaiting legislative amendments (as Press Release sans legislative amendment/ relevant notification may not be workable).

One reason for the missing immediate steps / legislative amendments could be the impediment i.e. non-mention of specific procedure for pandemic under Article 279A of Constitution of India.

Twin mandate under Article 279A

As per Article 279A (9) of Constitution of India, "Every decision of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall be taken at a meeting, by a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present and voting, in accordance with the following principles…"

Given the specific twin requirement under Article 279A of Constitution of India, every decision by GST Council should be taken:

a. In a GST Council meeting and

b. By a majority of not-less than three fourths

However, due to the corona virus pandemic, the GST Council is unable to conduct meeting (after its 39th meeting held on 14th March 2020) particularly since the pandemic has started threatening and effectively put the entire nation on ‘pause' mode.

Can CGST Act come to rescue?

As an interim and exceptional measure, to tide over the challenging times, the GST Council may explore Section 148 (which provides for ‘Special procedure for certain processes') or section 168 (which provides for ‘Power to issue instructions or directions').

Usage of section 148 of CGST Act could be challenging as even section 148 is to be used after recommendations of the Council. Further, section 168 of CGST Act is to be used for the purpose of uniformity in the implementation of GST Act, however, the power bestowed under section 168 and the pandemic being faced does not reconcile.

All said and done, as Constitution of India is supreme, provision of CGST Act may not be able to override the mandatory process under Article 279A of Constitution of India.

What to do then?

Article 279A (8) provides as under:

'The Goods and Services Tax Council shall determine the procedure in the performance of its functions.'

Based on the aforesaid provision, the GST Council can, through a video conference immediately provide, separate process to get over impasse like current pandemic (including introduction of process or new section, if required, for such pandemic).

One of the prescribed procedures could be to empower, during the interim time period, the Chairman of GST Council to take decisions and for uniformity purposes, it is recommendable that such decisions of Chairman should be applicable in all States. However, whether the States will agree for handing over their power to Union, even for a brief period, is itself a big question.

However, in the long run, to address such pandemic, Article 279A of Constitution of India could be amended (to prescribe procedure for exceptional times).

What about Financial Emergency?

It may be noted that amongst three types of emergencies, Article 360 of Constitution of India provides for ‘Financial Emergency'. Article 360 (3) Constitution of India provides as under:

'(3) During the period any such Proclamation as is mentioned in clause (1) is in operation, the executive authority of the Union shall extend to the giving of directions to any State to observe such canons of financial propriety as may be specified in the directions, and to the giving of such other directions as the President may deem necessary and adequate for the purpose'.

As per news reports, even a PIL was filed in the Apex Court to declare Financial Emergency. However, in one of the press conferences the Hon'ble Finance Minister informed that there was no move to impose Financial Emergency.

Way forward

Now, whilst, the dust on the aforesaid matter settles, the GST payer will need to wait for the relevant notifications and Circulars for availing the announced relief in GST compliances.

(Author is Founder and CEO of CA Pritam Mahure and Associates. The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.