News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Input Service Distributor Mechanism - adopting the right path

APRIL 29, 2020

By Monil Parikh, Partner, NMAH & Co., Mumbai

THE ISD Mechanism is a method provided to suppliers of goods or services or both to have a centralised GST number acting as an "Input Service Distributor" who can receive invoices towards various services provided by vendors. The Input Service Distributor can distribute such credit to respective recipients having the same PAN as the Input Service Distributor as per the prescribed procedure in GST Law.

Let us discuss some common issues concerning ISD Mechanism wherein the on-going practices of various companies apparently deviate from the actual provisions mandated by the GST Law.

1. Manner of Distribution of Credit by Input service distributor

Often the entire credit received on ISD number is distributed amongst all the states of the entity based on the turnover ratio of the states of the previous year. However, there must be instances that the services are actually not received by all the states but only by a few states. In such cases, credit must be allocated to those specific states only, that is, the credit available shall be distributed only amongst those states where the services have been actually received.

a.) When the expense pertains to one state(recipient) only-

Section 20(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017 states that if the services are used only by one of its recipient/state and none other, then the input tax credit of such bills that are specifically attributable to one state must be allocated to that state entirely.

b.) When the expense pertains to few states (more than one but not all states)-

Section 20(2)(d) states that if the services are used by more than one recipient/state but not all, then the input tax credit should be distributed to those states on pro rata basis of turnover in state to the aggregate of the turnover of all such recipients to whom such input service is attributable and which are operational.

Example:

X Ltd has GST registration in total 5 states i.e. Maharashtra, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Delhi, Assam.

State

Gujarat

Rajasthan

Delhi

Assam

Maharashtra

Total

Turnover

800,000

700,000

500,000

400,000

10,00,000

34,00,000

X Ltd receives invoices from supplier ‘A' with an input tax credit of Rs. 1,80,000/-, wherein the services are used by all states other than Gujarat and Delhi.

Calculation of Distribution: -

Total Ratio

State

Gujarat

Rajasthan

Delhi

Assam

Maharashtra

Total

Turnover

800,000

700,000

500,000

400,000

10,00,000

34,00,000

Ratio

23.53%

20.58%

14.71%

11.76%

29.42%

100%

Distribution Ratio

State

Gujarat

Rajasthan

Delhi

Assam

Maharashtra

Total

Turnover

 

700,000

 

400,000

10,00,000

21,00,000

Ratio

 

33.33%

 

19.05%

47.62%

100%

Input Tax Credit Distribution

State

Gujarat

Rajasthan

Delhi

Assam

Maharashtra

Total

Ratio

 

33.33%

 

19.05%

47.62%

100%

Allocation

 

60,000

 

34,285.71

85,714.29

1,80,000

The above method of distribution is important because if credit is distributed to those states where services are actually not received, then that is a violation of the basic principle which entitles a registered person to claim the credit. As per Section 16(2)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, credit can be taken by only the one who has received the services. Hence, if credit is distributed to a state where it has actually not received the services, then the authorities shall deny that credit, and it shall result in loss of credit along with interest and penalty exposure.

c.) When the expense pertains to all the states-

Section 20(2)(e) states that if the services are used by all recipients/states then the input tax credit should be distributed amongst all the states on pro-rata basis of turnover in state to the aggregate of the turnover of all recipients/states and which are operational.

Taking the same example as above, the Input Tax Credit of Rs.1,80,000/- would be distributed in the following manner:

State

Gujarat

Rajasthan

Delhi

Assam

Maharashtra

Total

Turnover

800,000

700,000

500,000

400,000

10,00,000

34,00,000

Ratio

23.53%

20.58%

14.71%

11.76%

29.42%

100%

ITC

42,352

37,059

26,471

21,176

52,941

1,80,000

It is crucial to identify the services/invoices/vendors for which credit is to be allocated to some specific states and the services/invoices/vendors for which credit is to be assigned to all the states so that distribution can be done correctly.

2. Credit Note under ISD

If any credit note is issued by a vendor on ISD number, then the GST as per credit note shall be reversed in the same ratio which was used for distribution of credit in the original invoice. This is in line with the prescribed Rule 39(j) of the CGST Rules.

Also, Rule 39(2) states that if the amount of input tax credit distributed by an Input Service Distributor is reduced later on for any other reason for any of the recipients, including that it was distributed to a wrong recipient by the Input Service Distributor, the process specified in clause (j) of sub-rule (1) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, for reduction of credit. This means that the ratio of the original erroneous distribution must be used for the correction.

Accordingly, for every credit note/reversal, the original/corresponding invoice date must be readily available in the system/reports.

3. Reconciliation of ISD entries in books with those reflecting in 6A

As per Rule 39(1)(a) of the CGST Rules, the input tax credit available for distribution in a month shall be distributed in the same month and the details thereof shall be furnished in FORM GSTR-6 in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VIII of these rules.

Currently, many companies take a lag of certain months in availment and distribution of credit. Two-way reconciliation is done between GSTR-6A and ITC Register (ISD Invoices) every month on a cumulative basis before filing GSTR-6. ITC is availed and distributed only of those invoices which are reflecting/matching in GSTR 6A.

However legally, keeping in view the words "available for distribution", in case of unmatched invoices it is advisable to follow below mentioned practice: -

- ITC reflecting in GSTR 6A but not in books - find out if booked earlier and credit taken or not, if not booked earlier then find out internally whether an invoice is available if yes and payment made take/distribute ITC, if booked in a month later than that current month, then take/distribute when invoice available + payment made.

- Available in books but not in GSTR 6A - follow up with a vendor, find out if the vendor had uploaded in any previous GSTR-6A or ask him to add the invoice in next month GSTR-1. Take/distribute when the invoice appears in GSTR 6A.

Availment of credit must be done timely as per FORM GSTR-6A, and proper reconciliation must be maintained with books of accounts.

4. Issuing proper documents - ISD Invoice/Credit note

Rule 39(g) & 39(h) state that the Input Service Distributor shall issue an Input Service Distributor invoice, clearly indicating in such invoice that it is issued only for distribution of input tax credit and an Input Service Distributor credit note, for reduction of credit in case the input tax credit already distributed gets reduced for any reason.

Proper documentation should be maintained for input tax credit distributed and reversed for every month.

CONCLUSION:

The concept of ISD Mechanism is carried forward from the Service Tax regime and must be used in the right manner to allow the respective recipients to receive credit. It must not be confused with the unique cross charge mechanism introduced in the GST regime.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.