News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
SVB & Valuation of Goods Imported from Related Party

MAY 05, 2020

By Jeevesh Mehta, Advocate

IT is common for a commercial establishment, whether manufacturer or a trading concern to import raw materials, semi finished goods or finished goods from other countries. Import plays an important role in terms of availability of new technology, better quality goods, rate of goods etc.

2. Importing goods from various countries can be a part of corporate strategy which is mostly cost effective for a company having its branches / subsidiaries in various countries. The cost effectiveness and ease in dealing with a sister concern/ subsidiary often leads to special treatments given to each other.

Example: Ram and Shyam are brothers. Ram has a car which he wants to sell. Shyam showed his desire to purchase that car for his use. Ram offered Shyam a price of Rs 1 Lakh for the car, being totally aware that he can sell the car in the open market for Rs 150,000/-. But because Shyam is his brother he wants to give him a special discount.

The discount given by Ram to Shyam is quite natural and is a human phenomenon. The same behavior is often seen between the corporates who are related to each other, may be as a Holding - Subsidiary, Sister Concern having one or more holding regulators etc. Therefore, whenever these companies buy and sell goods amongst each other, the sale is done without adding any profit margin or not at normal market value. This is called an influence on the price of goods due to the relation between the companies/parties.

3. As far as pricing between the related companies is concerned, it can be a part of corporate strategy, obligations or through an agreement. But from the perspective of Revenue department, this kind of business behaviour leads to evasion of taxes / duties.

Example: Indian Company (Importer) who is importing a particular product from its parent company in JAPAN at an invoice value of 00 and pays customs duty on the said value. But if that Indian concern or any other importer imports the same product from an unrelated supplier, then the invoice value would be USD 8000 and applicable customs duty is to be paid on USD 8000.

In the aforementioned scenario, the Customs, is losing customs duty on USD 3000 since the parties are related. To curb the loss of revenue and to deal with such kind of scenarios, the authorities developed a Specialized Investigation Branch of Customs. This branch of customs is called "SPECIAL VALUATION BRANCH OF CUSTOMS (S V B)".

 4. As per Rule 2(2) of Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (Customs Valuation rules), persons shall be deemed to be "related" only if:-

i) they are officers or directors of one another's businesses

ii) they are legally recognized partners in business ;

iii) they are employer and employee;

iv) any person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds 5 per cent or more of the outstanding voting stock or shares of both of them;

v) one of them directly or indirectly controls the other ;

vi) both of them are directly or indirectly controlled by a third person;

vii) together they directly or indirectly control a third person;

viii) they are members of the same family.

Apart from the above categories and as per the facts and circumstances of each case, those who are having Collaboration Agreement, Technical Assistance Agreement or any other agreement / contract with the foreign supplier have to prove genuineness of their declared value before the Jurisdictional Commissioner or SVB.

The SVBs are presently functioning at the Customs Houses at Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, Delhi and Mumbai. In cases where the import takes place through Customs Houses of Mumbai / Delhi / Chennai / Kolkata / Bangalore, the importer is free to select the SVB of the Customs House of import or the Customs House most proximate to the corporate office, as convenient to him.

Whether the case requires SVB investigation or not ?

It is imperative on the part of the Importer to declare while filing Bill of Entry that the goods are being imported from a related party as it would be necessary for the Customs to examine whether or not the circumstances surrounding the sale of the imported goods indicate that the relationship has influenced the price. In such situation, importers are advised that if their transaction falls in such a category they should, insofar as possible, file a prior bill of entry as provided under the second proviso to subsection (3) of section 46 of the Customs Act, 1962, preferably 15 days prior to the import. The clearing custom house may ask for PD Bond for such imports as it is generally presumed that such imports will be cleared on provisional assessment of the assessable value of the goods. If the prior PD Bond is not filed, the importer may face difficulties once the consignment has arrived at the port and end up in paying demurrages.

Submission of Annexure A before the Jurisdictional Commissionerate of Custom at the Place of Import.

After the importer declares the relation or while filing the bill of entry, he has to file prescribed Annexure A before the Commissioner of Customs or the concerned officer of the Customs House of Place of Import so as to enable such officer to determine whether, prima facie, there is a need for investigation by the SVB or not.

Decision of Jurisdictional Commissioner of place of import to refer or not to refer the case to SVB.

After taking and analysing the relevant information/ declarations submitted by the Importer under the related party import transaction, the Commissioner of the place of import can decide as to whether the case needs to be investigated by SVB or the assessment of such imports can be finalized by himself under rule 3 or 4 to 9 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

Categories of cases where SVB investigation not required

The following cases are not to be taken up for inquiries by SVBs :

(i) Import of samples and prototypes from related sellers

(ii) Imports from related sellers where duty chargeable (including additional duty of Customs etc.) is unconditionally fully exempted or nil.

(iii) Any transaction where the value of imported goods is less than Rs 1 lac but cumulatively these transactions do not exceed Rs 25 lacs in any financial year

Procedure followed in Special Valuation Branch

Upon receipt of all related records from the referring customs formation, the SVB shall forthwith assign a case number and update the Central Registry Database (CRD) maintained by DGoV. The SVB shall also inform the RMD of the details of the importer, his IEC code, and details of seller for inserting suitable instructions for assessing officers at all Customs Houses so as to ensure provisional assessments during the currency of SVB inquiries.

Submission of Annexure B with relevant documents

SVB after receiving the reference from Commissionerate of Place of import, then call for other information, documents and declarations including prescribed Annexure B from the importer, and shall commence inquiries. The importer is also given suitable opportunity to submit all documents, declarations and evidence in support of the declared value.

Levy of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) during pendency of SVB investigation

The procedure and mandate of levy of EDD upon the importer while the case is pending before SVB investigation has been amended vide Circular no 05/2016 Customs, wherein it is provided that no EDD shall be obtained from the importers in case the importer provides the documents and information required for SVB inquiries within 60 days of such requisition. But, in case the importer fails to provide such documents and information within such stipulated time then EDD @ 5% of the declared assessable value shall be imposed by the Commissioner for a period not exceeding the next three months. As the EDD is in the nature of security deposit, the Importer has an option to pay EDD by way of cash deposit or a Bank Guarantee.

It is important to note here that vide the Circular 05/2016 it has been very clearly specified that the EDD @5% can not be imposed for a period of more than 3 months. But it is seen and observed many a times while dealing with various SVB branches across the country that the SVB investigations are kept pending even after providing all the information/ documents and EDD @5% is being levied for period of more than 3 months till the time IR is finalized by SVB. Importers are advised to be cautious over this aspect and must try to provide all the required documents within stipulated time of 60 days to avoid payment of EDD @5% for 3 months or even for more than 3 months. Importer must insist SVB to finalize the "IR" at the earliest because the burden of EDD is often overseen by the importers, which consequently reduces margin in the product and increases financial burden.

Key Circumstances / Factors to be examined during investigation.

The proper officer or SVB as the case may be, shall carefully examine the "circumstances surrounding the sale" and evaluate the case on the following parameters:-.

i. Has the importer declared the price of the goods imported is a "transfer price"?
ii. What is the basis on which the price has been settled between the buyer & seller?
iii. Has the price been settled in a manner consistent with the way the seller settles prices for sales to buyer who are not related to the seller?
iv. Does the nature of relationship between the buyer and seller appear to influence the price?
v. Is the information provided by the importer in terms of rule 3 (3) (b) able to demonstrate that the transaction is at arms length ?
vi. Are there any payments, such as royalty, licence fee etc., actually made or to be made, as a condition of sale of the imported goods, by the buyer to the seller, or by the buyer to a third party to satisfy an obligation cast by the seller? Are such payments included in the price actually paid or payable?
vii. Whether any part of the proceeds of subsequent re-sale, disposal or use of the imported goods accrues, directly or indirectly, to the seller?
viii. What is the nature of other payments, if any, made or to be made by the buyer as a condition of sale of the imported goods?
ix. Has the importer entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement with the Income Tax Authorities or obtained an Advance Ruling ?
x. Will the prices paid or payable by the importer be settled with the seller at the end of a defined period by means of a debit note / credit note?
xi. Is there any royalty and licence fee' paid by the importer to the supplier or related party.
xii. Whether the value of any part of proceeds of any subsequent resale, disposal or use of imported goods accrues to the seller?
xiii. Whether any other payments are made or are contemplated to be made in future by buyer to seller as a condition of sale of imported goods etc.?

There can be other determination factors to be examined by the officer on case to case bases such as nature of the imported goods, the nature of the industry itself, the season in which the goods are imported, and whether the difference in values is commercially significant.

Note: During the investigation by SVB, the transfer pricing reports of the importer company plays an important role because to determine the genuineness of import value, the declarations made by importer before transfer pricing authorities for declaring the values as arrived at arms length bases becomes the bases of submissions before SVB.

Time frame to complete the investigation

As per the Circular 05/2016 it is prescribed that the SVBs shall as far as possible, complete the investigations and issue its findings within two months from the date of receipt of information in Annexure B. But most of cases there is always a need to extend the time period due to detailed information sought by SVB and time taken by the importers to submit the same. Therefore where the enquiry is not complete in 2 months, the SVB seeks the approval of the jurisdictional Commissioner for such extended time period as is deemed necessary to complete investigations.

Completion of investigation and submission of "Investigation Report" (IR).

Upon completing investigations, the SVB prepares an Investigation Report ("IR") with due approval of the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner, by incorporating all relevant facts, submissions made by the importer, investigative findings, grounds for acceptance or rejection of transaction value, and the extent of influence on declared transaction value, if any. The IR also includes all relied upon documents and is communicated to the referring customs station/appraising group and such other stations where imports have been provisionally assessed. A copy of the IR shall also be sent to the DGoV and concerned customs stations where imports of the importer are being finalized provisionally.

Finalisation of assessments

Where under the findings in "IR", the declared value is found to be un influenced ( Rule 3 CVR 2007)

The customs stations where provisional assessments have been undertaken immediately proceeds to finalize the same. There will be no issuance of a speaking order for finalising the provisional assessments in such cases.

Where as per findings in IR, the declared value is found to be influenced.

The Commissionerate at the custom station of the place of import shall issue a show cause notice creating demand of duty to the importer within 15 days of the receipt of the IR, under intimation to the concerned SVB. After the adjudication of such Show cause notice, the order so passed by the adjudicating authority is Order in Original and appeal lies under Section XV of the Customs Act against such order.

Validity of "IR" or Final assessment and Change in circumstances surrounding the sale post finalization of assessment. ( Annexure C)

In the erstwhile regime of SVB investigations, the SVB order so passed was valid for 3 years and importers were required to renew the said order by declaring if there is any change in circumstances or even no change in circumstances.

At present vide Circular 05/2016 Customs, the SVB no longer passes an order in original or an appealable order on its own, rather it finalizes an Investigation Report ("IR"), on the bases of which the Jurisdictional Commissionerate at place of Import finalizes the provisional assessments or passes adjudication order as the case may be. Such "IR" or final assessment or adjudication order is valid indefinitely unless there is change in circumstance of sale or terms and conditions of agreement between importer and his related party supplier. In such a case the importers are required to declare the same at the place of import in the prescribed format under Annexure C.

In all such cases, the proper officer at the place of import shall examine the transactions as per procedures laid out above and the jurisdictional Commissioner shall refer the matter to SVB, where required.

Closing notes : SVB investigations are being handled differently across the country and by different kind of professionals such as Chartered Accountants, Lawyers and even by teams of CHA's. It has been observed that SVB investigation requires specialized knowledge of Valuation Rules, relevant provisions Customs Laws, import transactions and understanding of the importance of the documents submitted before SVB. The basic documents which are required to be submitted are as under:

a. Copy of the Audited Financial Statements of at least 3 preceding financial years.

b. Transfer pricing declarations made by the importer Form 3CEB, and TP Reports for last few years.

c. All agreements with related parties.

d. Price list of products.

e. Back to back invoices of the imported products or cost certificates from supplier.

f. Advance Pricing agreements with CBDT.

Importer must be very careful in submitting the above documents along with other certificates and declarations asked for by SVB during investigations. Any wrong declaration or mistake on part of importer can be fatal leading to loading of the declared value of the imported goods in many folds. Such loading may lead to increased cost of import, reduced profits along with penalties and interest imposed upon the importer by the customs authorities.

[The author is Lead Partner, Maven Legal LLP and the views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.