News Update

WIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Faceless Assessment - Dawn of a new era - Part II

JUNE 10,2020

By Shailesh Sheth, Advocate & Founder, M/s. SPS LEGAL

IN Part-I, a bird's eye view of the major reforms undertaken by the CBIC in the field of Customs in the recent years was presented. It was explained how these initiatives have resulted into a quantum jump in the India's ranking from a dismissal 142 in 2014 to an impressive 63 in 2019 on the World Bank's 'Ease of doing business' Index. These reforms have paved the way for the phased roll out of the most critical reforms under the umbrella of the 'Turant Customs' viz. Faceless Assessment. In this Part, the salient aspects of 'Faceless Assessment' are discussed.

A. Putting the building blocks into place:

I . Constitution of the 'Faceless Assessment Groups':

The Board has recommended the establishment of two 'Faceless Assessment Groups', one for Chapter 84 and another for Chapter 85 of the CTA. These Groups would be independently set up at Bengaluru and Chennai Customs Zones and would comprise of the officers from both the zones. The Appraisers/ Superintendents and Assistant/Deputy Commissioners would be a part of these Groups and are expected to undertake the verification of assessment of any bill of entry that is assigned to the Group in the Customs Automated System. The Board has proposed the drawing of the officers from the existing appraising groups for Chapter 84 and 85 in each Customs station in each Zone to be made part of the Faceless Assessment Group. This is a pragmatic move as Chapters 84 and 85 of the CTA remain two of the most complex Chapters of the Tariff and numerous issues continue to surface with regard to the classification of the goods imported under these Chapters. The experience and expertise gained over the years by the existing Appraising Officers in each Zone to whom these Chapters are presently assigned would certainly help in making the Assessment process by the Faceless Assessment Group robust and less susceptible to the litigation.

Total number of the officers to be placed in each Group is left to the discretion of the Principal Chief Commissioners/Chief Commissioners of Customs of the selected zones who may determine the strength of the Group based on the volume of the bills of entry.

II. Constitution of the 'Port Assessment Group':

Port Assessment Groups (PAGs) are the Appraising Groups currently located in each port of import for verification of the assessment and other related functions. The PAGs are slated to handle all other functions pertaining to the bills of entry -

- which are not marked to the Faceless Assessment Group by the Customs Automated System; and

- that are referred by the Faceless Assessment Group to the port of import for any reason.

The 'port of import' is the Customs station of import of the goods where the importer has entered any bill of entry under S.46 or S.68 of the Customs Act, 1962 ('the CA') for home consumption or warehousing, as the case may be.

III. Turant Suvidha Kendras:

The Board has advised the setting up of the ' Turant Suvidha Kendras' ('TSK') in every Customs port of import. TSK would be a dedicated cell to be manned by the Customs Officers and would perform, amongst other functions, the functions and roles relating to:

a. Acceptance of Bond or Bank Guarantee;

b. Carrying out of any other verification that may be referred by the Faceless Assessment Groups;

c. Defacing of documents/permit licences, wherever required;

d. Debit of documents/permits/licences, wherever required; and

e. Such other functions as may be determined by the Commissioner to facilitate trade.

The basic objective behind setting up of the TSKs is to facilitate the trade in completing various formalities relating to the Customs assessment locally at the port of import even though the assessment may actually be done remotely or virtually by the proper officer physically located in another Customs station. It is heartening to note that the Board expects the officers manning the TSKs to be properly trained in their role as facilitators while ensuring legal compliance. This should be welcomed by the Trade as it can look forward to a 'facilitating role' - and not 'the obstructing role' - to be played by the TSKs. This hints at the possibility of the change in the mindset of the revenue officers entrusted with the tasks relating to the assessment.

It is also interesting to note that the Board has proposed the establishment of the TSKs in every Customs port of import. It is, therefore, evident that the TSKs will be a crucial cog in the 'assessment wheel' and are expected to ensure a smooth and friction-free running of the 'wheel' when pan India roll-out of 'Faceless Assessment' takes place by December 31, 2020, as proposed by the Board.

Readers may also note that at Bengaluru and Chennai, the 'Turant Suvidha Kendras' have already been set up and inaugurated on June 8, 2020.

IV. Empowerment of the 'Proper Officer' and Commissioner of Customs (Appeals):

It is obvious that the reform in the form of 'Faceless Assessment' cannot make headway unless the 'Proper Officers' are designated and empowered suitably to undertake the assessment of a bill of entry pertaining to any Customs station/port of import. This is essential as the 'Faceless Assessment', as stated above, is expected to be rolled out pan India by December 31, 2020.

The Board has accordingly issued a notification no. 50/2020-Customs (NT) on June 5, 2020 implementing Faceless Assessment across different Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner zones. This notification is issued under S.4(1) [i.e. Appointment of officers of customs] read with S.5(1) [i.e. Powers of officers of customs] read with S.2(34) [i.e. defining 'proper officer'] of the CA. The notification enables an assessing officer i.e. the proper officer under S.17 [i.e. Assessment of duty] and S.18 [i.e. Provisional assessment of duty], who is physically located in a particular jurisdiction to assess a bill of entry pertaining to imports made at a different Customs station/port of import, whenever such a bill of entry has been assigned to him in the Customs Automated System . However, in the Phase-I of the roll-out, the applicability of this notification is being restricted only to the inter-linking of Bengaluru and Chennai Customs Zones for the purpose of 'Faceless Assessment'.

The Board, by its aforesaid Instructions, has instructed that effective from 8th June, 2020, the Customs Automated System would assign the non-facilitated bills of entry filed for imports of articles primarily falling under Chapters 84 and 85 of the CTA, at any of the Customs station/ports of import of Bengaluru and Chennai Customs Zones, to the officers of the Faceless Assessment Group concerned for assessment on a first-come-first basis. In other words, irrespective of whether the goods are imported at any Customs station/ port of import falling under the jurisdiction of Bengaluru or Chennai Customs Zone, the bills of entry pertaining to the said two Chapters will be marked by the Customs Automated System to the nominated Faceless Assessment Group for assessment.

For the uninitiated, it may be clarified that the concept of the categorization of a bill of entry into 'facilitated' or 'non-facilitated' stems from the 'Risk Management System' ('RMS') in Imports' which, along with the 'Accredited Clients Programme' ('ACP'), was implemented in 2005. The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai by its Public Notice no. 68/2006 dated 26.05.2006, has prescribed a detailed procedure for clearance of the Bills of Entry under the Indian Customs EDI System ('ICES') after the introduction of the RMS. Primarily, the 'facilitated bills of entry' are those self-assessed bills of entry which have been processed by the RMS for the evaluation of risk, if any, therein and the duty is calculated and challan is generated by ICES based on the declaration/self assessment by the importer. On the other hand, the 'non-facilitated Bills of Entry' are those bills of entry which are selected for further action on the following basis viz. -

- Selection by the RMS based on the risk parameters and also on a random basis;

- Selection on the basis of specific intelligence available;

- In case any non-compliance is noticed.

On a careful perusal of the Board's captioned Circular and the Instructions dated June 5, 2020, it appears that only ' non-facilitated' bills of entry filed for the import of goods primarily falling under Chapter 84 and 85 of the CTA will be assigned for the purpose of the 'Faceless Assessment'. This is quite significant as it would mean that every bill of entry filed for the import of goods under these two Chapters at Customs Stations/port of import of Bengaluru and Chennai Customs Zones will not automatically be subjected to the 'Faceless Assessment'. The Board, it appears, is moving slowly and cautiously in the implementation of this reform and it is a welcome strategy.

The Board has also simultaneously issued another notification no. 51/2020-Customs (NT) on June 5, 2020, whereby the jurisdictional Commissioners of Customs (Appeals) at Bengaluru and Chennai are empowered to take up the appeals filed in respect of Faceless Assessments pertaining to the imports made in their jurisdiction even though the assessing officer may be located at the other customs station.

To illustrate, Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) at Bengaluru would decide appeal filed for imports at Bengaluru though the assessing officer may be located at Chennai. This is a pragmatic and thoughtful move as it will ensure that the trade is not put to any hardship or inconvenience and can get their appeals heard locally, as at present.

[To Be Continued…]

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.