News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
To Err is Human and GSTN is no exception, but correcting it deserves kudos

JULY 20, 2020

By CA Ashish Kr Bansal

SINCE the advent of GST ecosystem in India, professionals, taxpayers and other stakeholders often complain about various technical glitches which does not make the experience of the still evolving system a great one. We also often hear that despite raising grievance on various forums including the GST portal, generally there is no response. However, I recently experienced a very friendly and accommodating side of GSTN, which I would like to present to the readers-

Grievance

The refund of accumulated Input tax credit due to inverted structure or export of goods without payment of duty is calculated as per formula given in Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules, 2017. The Master Circular no. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18-11-2019 governing such refund prescribes one more check for calculation of refund as reproduced below -

"37.  In case of refunds pertaining to items listed at (a), (c) and (e) in  para 3  above, the common portal calculates the refundable amount as the least of the following amounts:

(a) The maximum refund amount as per the formula in rule 89(4) or rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules [formula is applied on the consolidated amount of ITC, i.e. Central tax + State tax/Union Territory tax + Integrated tax];

(b) The balance in the electronic credit ledger of the applicant at the end of the tax period for which the refund claim is being filed after the return in  FORM GSTR-3B  for the said period has been filed; and

(c) The balance in the electronic credit ledger of the applicant at the time of filing the refund application.

After calculating the least of the three amounts, as detailed above, the equivalent amount is to be debited from the electronic credit ledger of the applicant in the following order:

(a) Integrated tax, to the extent of balance available;

(b) Central tax and State tax/Union Territory tax, equally to the extent of balance available and in the event of a shortfall in the balance available in a particular electronic credit ledger (say, Central tax), the differential amount is to be debited from the other electronic credit ledger (i.e., State tax/Union Territory tax, in this case)."

Since it has been categorically mentioned in sub-para (a) that maximum refund amount as per formula given in Rule 89(4) or Rule 89(5) has to be calculated on consolidated ITC, therefore, it is implied that amounts mentioned at sub-para (b) and sub-para (c) refers to consolidated balance of electronic credit ledger. Hence,after finding least of three amounts on consolidated basis, the same has to be debited from electronic credit ledger in the following order -

(a) Integrated tax, to the extent of balance available;

(b) Central tax and State tax/Union Territory tax, equally to the extent of balance available and in the event of a shortfall in the balance available in a particular electronic credit ledger (say, Central tax), the differential amount is to be debited from the other electronic credit ledger (i.e., State tax/Union Territory tax, in this case).

However GST portal compares the amount in sub-para (b) and sub-para (c) given above on individual tax heads basis instead of consolidated amount as in case of sub-para (a).

The above practice adopted by GST portal leads to anomalies which can be understood through the below mentioned example -

Maximum Refund amount calculated as per Rule 89(5) is Rs 16,30,570/-

 

Balance in Electronic Credit ledger at the end of tax period for which refund id claimed remaining after return for this period is filed (1)

Balance in Electronic Credit ledger at the time of filing of Refund Application (2)

Refund to be claimed (3)

IGST

917638

0.00

0.00

CGST

277252

3163800

277252

SGST

311002

864748

311002

Total

1505892

4028548

588254

As is evident from above table, the portal is allowing the taxpayer to submit refund of only Rs 5,88,254/- as against Refund eligible to them of Rs 15,05,892/- (being least of Rs 16,30,570/-, Rs 15,05,892/- & Rs 40,28,548/-). This is due to the fact that after insertion of Sec 49A w.e.f from 01/02/2019 which requires that IGST credit has to be utilised fully before utilising the CGST credit and SGST credit, IGST credit has been utilised fully where as balance in CGST and SGST has not been utilised. The anomaly has created a situation where taxpayers are not able to file online refund application particularly in case of refund for Financial year 2018-19 being filed now. Since Section 49A was inserted w.e.f 1st Feb 2019, all IGST credit accumulated by taxpayers in 2018-19 due to inverted structure got utilised in subsequent months resulting in shifting of accumulated credit to CGST and SGST heads.

Grievance redressal Portal - a pleasant experience

A grievance was raised on grievance redressal portal https://selfservice.gstsystem.in/ in the first week of July 2020 after which GSTN team contacted the taxpayer on the email id given. After exchange of several emails over a span of 5 days, the anomalous situation was explained to GSTN team quoting the above circular.

The GSTN team finally responded as follows -

Resolution: Dear Taxpayer, System will be amended to incorporate such changes, after which such refund application can be filed. Inconvenience regretted. Thanks, GSTN Team.

The above assurance by GSTN is pleasing to the ears of several hundred taxpayers whose refund applications have been stuck due the above anomaly. Such a response is the right step in fulfilling the mantra of - ease of doing business!

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.