News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
E-Invoice for credit note and debit note

NOVEMBER 10, 2020

By Akhil C Varghese, CA

AS a measure to curb tax evasion, increase compliance and reduce issues relating to input tax credit verification 1, with effect from 1st October 2020, the Government has introduced system of E-invoicing under the GST law. As per the provisions of law prevailing till date (which are discussed below), an e-invoice is required to be generated by registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from 2017-18 onwards exceeds Rs. 500 crores except certain categories of persons.

E-Invoicing, unlike the nomenclature seems to suggest, is not a method of preparing GST invoice on the GST Electronic Portal but preparing the invoice in the system of the registered person after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) by uploading the necessary details and registering his transaction on the Invoice Registration Portal (IRP). In other words, the specified person registered under the GST law would continue to prepare their invoice in their own system . Number of learning materials and FAQs are available in the public domain regarding the process by which e-invoicing has to be done.

The term 'e-invoice' i.e. electronic invoice, also tends to create the impression that it is applicable only in relation to 'invoices' issued under the GST law and this has become the cause of a confusion in the industry, especially in the context of credit/debit notes issued in compliance of the GST law.

This article, in addition to analysing whether a registered person is legally bound to follow e-invoicing procedure for credit note and debit note issued under the GST Law, also discusses the issues that can be raised by the department if the e-invoicing procedure is not followed for credit note and debit note issued under the GST Law.

Legal provisions relating to e-invoice

The Central Government vide Notification No. 68/2019–C.T., dated 13.12.2019 inserted the following sub-rules in Rule 48 of the CGST Rules, 2017 ('CGST Rules') which read as under:

"(4) The invoice shall be prepared by such class of registered persons as may be notified by the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, by including such particulars contained in FORM GST INV-01 after obtaining an Invoice Reference Number by uploading information contained therein on the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal in such manner and subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be specified in the notification.

(5) Every invoice issued by a person to whom sub-rule (4) applies in any manner other than the manner specified in the said sub-rule shall not be treated as an invoice.

(6) The provisions of sub-rules (1) and (2) shall not apply to an invoice prepared in the manner specified in sub-rule (4).".

[Emphasis supplied]

The aforesaid provisions clearly use the term 'invoice'. Section 2(66) of the CGST Act, 2017 ('CGST Act') defines "invoice" or "tax invoice" means the tax invoice referred to in Section 31 of the CGST Act.

As per Section 31 of the CGST Act, a registered person supplying taxable goods or taxable services is required to issue tax invoice in such manner containing such particulars as prescribed under the CGST Rules. The tax invoice must contain such particulars as prescribed in Rule 46 of the CGST Rules and has to be issued in such manner as prescribed under Rule 48 of the CGST Rules. The Central Government vide Notification No. 72/2020–C.T., dated 30.09.2020 amended Rule 46 providing that the tax invoice referred in Section 31 shall contain one more particular which is Quick Response code, having embedded Invoice Reference Number (IRN) in it, in case invoice has been issued in the manner prescribed under sub-rule (4) of rule 48.

Here, the author would like to highlight that Section 31 of the CGST Act does not deal with debit note and credit note issued under the GST Law. The provisions related to debit note and credit note is separately covered under Section 34 of the CGST Act.

The credit note and debit note must contain such particulars as prescribed under Rule 53(1A) of the CGST Rules. The said rule does not contain any particulars relating to QR code as specifically provided in Rule 46 of the CGST Rules.

Hence, it is evident that under the GST law, credit note and/or debit note are distinct from invoice and are governed by provisions different from the provisions governing invoices.

In light of the above analysis, on strict reading of aforementioned legal provisions prevailing till date, in view of the author, a registered person who is covered under the e-invoicing provisions, is not liable to issue credit note and debit note by following the e-invoicing procedure. In other words, QR code, having embedded IRN is not required to be included in the credit note and debit note issued under section 34 of the CGST Act.

Having made the above analysis, it is also important to highlight the FAQs issued by the GSTN which clarify that credit notes and debit notes are covered under e-invoicing.

The relevant portion of the FAQ is extracted hereunder:

"9. What documents are presently covered under e-invoicing?

i. Invoices

ii. Credit Notes

iii. Debit Notes,

when issued by notified class of taxpayers (to registered persons (B2B) or for the purpose of Exports) are currently covered under e-invoice".

Further, the Format/Schema for e-invoice prescribed vide Notification No. 60/2020–C.T., dated 30.07.2020 also covers debit note and credit note as document types.

The FAQ as mentioned above is going beyond the scope of e-invoicing provisions prevailing in CGST Rules.

It needs to be noted that a similar issue of coverage of e-invoicing in respect of export transactions was resolved by the Government by including the activity of export also under e-invoicing.

In the same breath, we should also examine the issue that would be faced by a registered person who opts not to follow e-invoicing procedure while issuing credit note or debit note under the GST Law.

In terms of Rule 36 of the CGST Rules, debit note is one of the prescribed documents for claiming input tax credit. Further, under the GST Law, a debit note shall include a supplementary invoice also. Therefore, if the registered person who is required to follow the e-invoicing procedure has not followed the same while issuing debit note under the GST Law, then the department may rely on the FAQs and e-invoice schema issued by the Government and can question the input tax credit availed by the recipient based on the debit note. Similarly, the department can question the benefits to be availed by a registered person in the form of reducing the tax liability where the credit notes issued without having QR code. The said issues may then have to be contested legally.

Conclusion

Even though the legal provisions under the GST Law do not require the registered person to follow the e-invoicing procedure while issuing credit note and debit note, the FAQs and the e-invoice schema suggest that the intention of the Government is to include credit note and debit note also under e-invoicing system. It is highly possible that the Government can at any time amend the CGST Rules to include credit note and debit note also under the ambit of e-invoicing as we have already seen in the case of e-invoicing for export transactions. If the notification is issued with prospective effect, then the registered person has to develop their IT system within a short span of time to generate QR code for credit note and debit note also, but, if the notification is issued retrospectively from 1st October 2020, then the registered person who has not followed the e-invoicing procedure for the credit note and debit note issued, has to legally contest their case for the past transactions in addition to developing their IT system for the future transactions.

Therefore, it is advisable for the registered persons to develop their IT system and start issuing credit note and debit note also by following the e-invoicing procedure along with tax invoice in order to avoid any issues or litigation in the future.

(The author is a Senior Associate with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Kochi and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

1Para 37 of the Minutes of 35th GST Council Meeting held on 21st June 2019.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.