News Update

Israel-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?I-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCIsrael finally moving ahead with Rafah OperationsGST - Registration cancelled retrospectively on ground that physical verification revealed that the firm was non-existent - Petitioner had informed that they shifted business and had sought cancellation of registration - Order cancelling registration modified: HCNorway oil major boss says Europeans are not hard-working as compared to AmericansGST - Since registration was cancelled, petitioner could not access portal and view the SCNs and file replies - Order set aside and matter remitted: HCJio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficGST - Reply filed is a detailed one and if the proper officer was of the view that the same was unsatisfactory, he should have specifically sought further details - Matter is remitted: HCGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his healthGST - SCN does not put petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively - Order set aside and registration restored: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Non-application of mind - Proper officer has merely observed that the reply filed is unclear and unsatisfactory and, therefore, the demand is confirmed - Matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesCommercial Tax - Judgment of High Court is in jeopardy once appeal is entertained by Supreme Court - Appeals shall remain pending before the Appellate Board, Bench at Indore, till the issue is decided by Apex Court: HCUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranST - As the job-work undertaken by appellant amounts to manufacture, service tax cannot be levied on them under both Heads 'Business Auxiliary Service' and 'Business Support Service': CESTATRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyCX - Existence of corroborative evidence is essential in order to establish clandestine removal of goods and same cannot be merely based on assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT
 
E-Invoice for credit note and debit note

NOVEMBER 10, 2020

By Akhil C Varghese, CA

AS a measure to curb tax evasion, increase compliance and reduce issues relating to input tax credit verification 1, with effect from 1st October 2020, the Government has introduced system of E-invoicing under the GST law. As per the provisions of law prevailing till date (which are discussed below), an e-invoice is required to be generated by registered person whose aggregate turnover in any preceding financial year from 2017-18 onwards exceeds Rs. 500 crores except certain categories of persons.

E-Invoicing, unlike the nomenclature seems to suggest, is not a method of preparing GST invoice on the GST Electronic Portal but preparing the invoice in the system of the registered person after obtaining Invoice Reference Number (IRN) by uploading the necessary details and registering his transaction on the Invoice Registration Portal (IRP). In other words, the specified person registered under the GST law would continue to prepare their invoice in their own system . Number of learning materials and FAQs are available in the public domain regarding the process by which e-invoicing has to be done.

The term 'e-invoice' i.e. electronic invoice, also tends to create the impression that it is applicable only in relation to 'invoices' issued under the GST law and this has become the cause of a confusion in the industry, especially in the context of credit/debit notes issued in compliance of the GST law.

This article, in addition to analysing whether a registered person is legally bound to follow e-invoicing procedure for credit note and debit note issued under the GST Law, also discusses the issues that can be raised by the department if the e-invoicing procedure is not followed for credit note and debit note issued under the GST Law.

Legal provisions relating to e-invoice

The Central Government vide Notification No. 68/2019–C.T., dated 13.12.2019 inserted the following sub-rules in Rule 48 of the CGST Rules, 2017 ('CGST Rules') which read as under:

"(4) The invoice shall be prepared by such class of registered persons as may be notified by the Government, on the recommendations of the Council, by including such particulars contained in FORM GST INV-01 after obtaining an Invoice Reference Number by uploading information contained therein on the Common Goods and Services Tax Electronic Portal in such manner and subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be specified in the notification.

(5) Every invoice issued by a person to whom sub-rule (4) applies in any manner other than the manner specified in the said sub-rule shall not be treated as an invoice.

(6) The provisions of sub-rules (1) and (2) shall not apply to an invoice prepared in the manner specified in sub-rule (4).".

[Emphasis supplied]

The aforesaid provisions clearly use the term 'invoice'. Section 2(66) of the CGST Act, 2017 ('CGST Act') defines "invoice" or "tax invoice" means the tax invoice referred to in Section 31 of the CGST Act.

As per Section 31 of the CGST Act, a registered person supplying taxable goods or taxable services is required to issue tax invoice in such manner containing such particulars as prescribed under the CGST Rules. The tax invoice must contain such particulars as prescribed in Rule 46 of the CGST Rules and has to be issued in such manner as prescribed under Rule 48 of the CGST Rules. The Central Government vide Notification No. 72/2020–C.T., dated 30.09.2020 amended Rule 46 providing that the tax invoice referred in Section 31 shall contain one more particular which is Quick Response code, having embedded Invoice Reference Number (IRN) in it, in case invoice has been issued in the manner prescribed under sub-rule (4) of rule 48.

Here, the author would like to highlight that Section 31 of the CGST Act does not deal with debit note and credit note issued under the GST Law. The provisions related to debit note and credit note is separately covered under Section 34 of the CGST Act.

The credit note and debit note must contain such particulars as prescribed under Rule 53(1A) of the CGST Rules. The said rule does not contain any particulars relating to QR code as specifically provided in Rule 46 of the CGST Rules.

Hence, it is evident that under the GST law, credit note and/or debit note are distinct from invoice and are governed by provisions different from the provisions governing invoices.

In light of the above analysis, on strict reading of aforementioned legal provisions prevailing till date, in view of the author, a registered person who is covered under the e-invoicing provisions, is not liable to issue credit note and debit note by following the e-invoicing procedure. In other words, QR code, having embedded IRN is not required to be included in the credit note and debit note issued under section 34 of the CGST Act.

Having made the above analysis, it is also important to highlight the FAQs issued by the GSTN which clarify that credit notes and debit notes are covered under e-invoicing.

The relevant portion of the FAQ is extracted hereunder:

"9. What documents are presently covered under e-invoicing?

i. Invoices

ii. Credit Notes

iii. Debit Notes,

when issued by notified class of taxpayers (to registered persons (B2B) or for the purpose of Exports) are currently covered under e-invoice".

Further, the Format/Schema for e-invoice prescribed vide Notification No. 60/2020–C.T., dated 30.07.2020 also covers debit note and credit note as document types.

The FAQ as mentioned above is going beyond the scope of e-invoicing provisions prevailing in CGST Rules.

It needs to be noted that a similar issue of coverage of e-invoicing in respect of export transactions was resolved by the Government by including the activity of export also under e-invoicing.

In the same breath, we should also examine the issue that would be faced by a registered person who opts not to follow e-invoicing procedure while issuing credit note or debit note under the GST Law.

In terms of Rule 36 of the CGST Rules, debit note is one of the prescribed documents for claiming input tax credit. Further, under the GST Law, a debit note shall include a supplementary invoice also. Therefore, if the registered person who is required to follow the e-invoicing procedure has not followed the same while issuing debit note under the GST Law, then the department may rely on the FAQs and e-invoice schema issued by the Government and can question the input tax credit availed by the recipient based on the debit note. Similarly, the department can question the benefits to be availed by a registered person in the form of reducing the tax liability where the credit notes issued without having QR code. The said issues may then have to be contested legally.

Conclusion

Even though the legal provisions under the GST Law do not require the registered person to follow the e-invoicing procedure while issuing credit note and debit note, the FAQs and the e-invoice schema suggest that the intention of the Government is to include credit note and debit note also under e-invoicing system. It is highly possible that the Government can at any time amend the CGST Rules to include credit note and debit note also under the ambit of e-invoicing as we have already seen in the case of e-invoicing for export transactions. If the notification is issued with prospective effect, then the registered person has to develop their IT system within a short span of time to generate QR code for credit note and debit note also, but, if the notification is issued retrospectively from 1st October 2020, then the registered person who has not followed the e-invoicing procedure for the credit note and debit note issued, has to legally contest their case for the past transactions in addition to developing their IT system for the future transactions.

Therefore, it is advisable for the registered persons to develop their IT system and start issuing credit note and debit note also by following the e-invoicing procedure along with tax invoice in order to avoid any issues or litigation in the future.

(The author is a Senior Associate with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Kochi and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

1Para 37 of the Minutes of 35th GST Council Meeting held on 21st June 2019.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.