News Update

Yogi orders Judicial Probe into Hathras tragedyIndia, ADB sign USD170 mn loan to strengthen pandemic preparedness and responseBengal Governor gripes about protocol lapses during Siliguri visit; writes to State GovtCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCHealth Ministry issues Advisory to States in view of Zika virus cases from MaharashtraCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCExpert Committee on Climate Finance submits Report on transition finance to IFSCAGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCWIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June month
 
Basis to take ITC - GSTR 2A or GSTR 2B?

FEBRUARY 26, 2021

By Padmasri Manyam, Senior Associate, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, Bengaluru

ONE of the difficulties the taxpayers are facing today is reconciling the amount of ITC as per Form GSTR-2A with the amount of ITC taken in Form GSTR-3B. The Government has introduced yet another Form called Form GSTR-2B vide Notification No. 82/2020-Central Tax dated 10.11.2020, with effect from 01.01.2021. The implementation of Form GSTR-2B has increased the chaos among the taxpayers/Industry.

An attempt is made in this Article to discuss the recent changes made under Rule 36(4) and to highlight the nuances revolving around taking the ITC based on Form GSTR-2A or Form GSTR-2B.

A. Changes under Rule 36(4)?

- As per Rule 36(4) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, Input tax credit (ITC) availed in respect of invoice or debit note, the details of which have not been furnished 1 by the supplier shall not exceed 105% 2 of the eligible ITC available in respect of invoices or debit notes which are furnished by the supplier under Section 37(1) of the CGST Act, 2017.

- The details furnished by the supplier in his Form GSTR-1 or furnished using Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) by the quarterly return filers (QRMP Scheme), are made available to the recipient of supply under Form GSTR-2A in the GST common portal. With effect from 01st January 2021, the Government has notified Form GSTR-2B in addition to the Form GSTR-2A.

- Both, Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-2B contain details of inward supplies and ITC as available for the recipient (outward supplies furnished by the supplier). The question which arises now is what is the basis to compute 105% of the eligible ITC in terms of Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules. But, before examining said question, let us first understand the difference between Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-2B.

B. Difference between Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-2B:

Form GSTR-2A

Form GSTR-2B

- The details of inward supplies will be reflected on real-time basis as and when the supplier furnishes the outward supply details in his Form GSTR-1 or using IFF.

Eg: 1) in case where the supplier furnishes his Form GSTR-1 for the month of July 2020 in the month of January 2021 (delay in filing of the return), such details will be reflected in Form GSTR-2A of July 2020 for the recipient.

2) In case where the supplier filed GSTR-1 of July 2020 before the due date, however, he declares certain missed-out supplies of July 2020 in Form GSTR-1 of January 2021, such details will be reflected in Form GSTR-2A of January 2021 for the recipient.

- The details of inward supplies will be reflected based on the details of outward supplies furnished by the supplier between two due dates of Form GSTR-1 or between two due dates of IFF.

Eg: 1) Form GSTR-2B for the month of December 2020 contains the details uploaded by the supplier between 11th December 2020 till 11th January 2021.

2) In case where the supplier furnishes Form GSTR-1 for the month of December 2020 after 11th January 2021, the details will not be reflected in Form GSTR-2B of December 2020. Such details will be reflected only in Form GSTR-2B of the subsequent months.

- Form GSTR-2A is dynamic statement i.e. The details of inward supplies or the amount of ITC for any given tax period will change based on the date of generating Form GSTR-2A.

 

- Form GSTR-2B is Static statement i.e. The details of inward supplies or the amount of ITC for any given tax period will be constant, if Form GSTR-2B is generated after the due date of Form GSTR-1 or IFF for such tax period.

- There is no break-up of the amount of eligible and ineligible ITC under Form GSTR-2A.

- The recipient has to ascertain the eligible and ineligible ITC at invoice level.

- There is a break-up of eligible and ineligible ITC summary under Form GSTR-2B, basis the Place of supply, blocked credits under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act.

- In case where all the suppliers are tax compliant and furnish the outward supply details without fail on or before the due date, ITC as per Form GSTR-2A and ITC as per Form GSTR-2B would, ideally, be the same. However, for various reasons, the supplier may not be able to upload the returns on or before the due date which brings us back to the open question.

C. The open question is what is the basis to take ITC in terms of Rule 36(4)?

- With effect from 01.01.2021, the details uploaded by the supplier has been made available in both Form GSTR-2A as well as in Form GSTR-2B of the recipient. The Government has not yet clarified what is the basis to compute 105% of the eligible ITC in terms of Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules.

- As per 42nd Council meeting recommendations dated 05.10.2020, as part of the enhancement in features of return filing, the GST council has decided the 'Auto-population of input tax credit from suppliers' GSTR-1s through the newly developed facility in FORM GSTR-2B for monthly filers  w.e.f. 01.01.2021  and for quarterly filers  w.e.f. 01.04.2021'.

- Also, as per GSTN update dated 15.12.2020, the amount of ITC as per Form GSTR-2B is auto populated in Form GSTR-3B and the Taxpayers have an option to edit and modify the amount of ITC auto-populated in Form GSTR-3B at present.

Conclusion:

Form GSTR-2B is static statement and the amount of ITC for a tax period will be frozen after the due date of Form GSTR-1 or IFF for the respective tax period, whereas, Form GSTR-2A is dynamic and the amount of ITC keeps changing as and when the supplier uploads the details. Hence, it may be advisable for the recipient to take ITC, basis the Form GSTR-2B so that the amount of ITC will not change subsequent to the filing of returns.

The system is also auto-populating ITC as per Form GSTR-2B in Form GSTR-3B. Thus, it can be inferred that the Government's intention also is to consider the eligible ITC as per Form GSTR-2B for the purpose of Rule 36(4). Nevertheless,  in order to avoid any confusion among the taxpayers or to avoid future disputes, the clarification from the Government in this regard is crucial.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

1The term 'uploaded' appearing in the rule substituted with the term 'furnished', w.e.f. 01.01.2021

2Provisional credit reduced from 10% to 5%, w.e.f. 01.01.2021

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: itc as per 2A

very nicely explained.
still moot question is what is the constitutional or legal validity of the rule 36(4).


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.