Budget 2024 Updates

Govt to focus on productivity of agriculture with climate-resilient seedsFM allocates Rs 2 lakh outlay for PM's five schemes for job creation and farmersFM Nirmala Sitharaman presents 7th Union Budget in ParliamentBudget 2024: FM arrives at Parliament; Speech to begin at 11AMEconomic Survey 2023-24 - from GST PerspectiveUkrainian FM goes on tour to ChinaI-T- Additions framed u/s 69A are untenable where affidavits submitted by assessee's parents to explain source of cash deposits, were discarded by AO without consideration : ITATSurvey acknowledges productivity loss due to mental health disordersI-T- Short term capital gains returned by the assessee in terms of provisions of section 50 of the Act on assets held for a period of more than 36 months be treated as long term capital gains: ITATExpenditure on social services up from 6.7% to 7.8% of GDP: SurveyI-T-Additions framed u/s 68 are upheld where assessee is unable to prove genuineness of transaction involving purchase and sale of penny stock: ITATTrade deficit contracts to USD 78 bn from USD 126 bn in 2023I-T-Re-assessment is invalidated when there is no failure on part of assessee to make full and true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATCorporate profitability has peaked to 15-yr-old high between 2020-2023: SurveyI-T- When cash generated out of sales has been credited in the books of accounts, the provisions of Sec.69A could not be invoked: ITATBudget 2024: More relief for senior citizens & individual taxpayers on card; tweaking of capital gains tax likely; steady capital expenditure to stayI-T- If any amount invested is purely a strategic investment & for purpose of commercial expediency, then AO cannot hold such investments to be for non-business purpose: ITATGoogle backpedals on plan to scrap cookies from ChromeCus - For a HNWI individual, an expensive watch of 'Rolex' make would be his personal effect but same may not be the case if the person is of mere means - Pendant studded with diamonds not liable for confiscation: HCGovt amends Recruitment Rules for Debts Recovery TribunalGST - Even if no date, time or place of hearing is indicated in the notice issued, it was the duty of assessee to file his reply to SCN, which was admittedly received - Plea regarding violation of principles of natural justice cannot be countenanced: HCAbhinav Bindra conferred with Olympic OrderGST - Mismatch between value of e-way bills generated on portal and returns filed in Form GSTR-3B - Petitioner did not provide a comprehensive explanation - To remit sum of Rs.3.50 crores within six weeks - Matter remanded: HCHackers mercilessly hack Bangladesh PM’s website along with police portalsGST - Rule 30 of Rules, 2017 - Assessing officer ought to have issued summons and obtained clarification rather than estimating the outward supply value at 110% of purchase value - Order set aside and matter remanded subject to remit of 10% disputed tax demand: HCUS law-makers call for resignation of Secret Service chief in Trump assassination caseGST - Net ITC shown incorrectly - An inadvertent error was committed and such error was rectified, albeit irregularly, however, sum recovered from petitioner's bank account - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCKarnataka IT Industries piling pressure on govt to extend working hoursGST - Since notification is declared unconstitutional, Amount of IGST paid pursuant to Entry No. 10 of Notification No. 10 of 2017 is to be refunded along with statutory interest: HCStudy says earth’s water depleting fastFDI inflows slide to USD 26.5 bn in 2024 from USD 42 bn in 2023: Economic Survey
 
What is the GST rate on Hand sanitizers?

JUNE 16, 2021

By Vijay Kumar

NEARLY a year ago, I wrote - While your hands were being sanitized

While you were sanitising your hands frequently and positively hoping to keep corona at bay or away from you, the frontline tax soldiers of the government were working hard thinking of ways and means to fatten the coffers before the curve is flattened. Putting themselves to great risks, the GST Intelligence officers are reported to have arrested some directors of a company manufacturing sanitizer and have also seized several drums of the offending sanitizer. I only hope our sincere officers kept a safe distance and were fully sanitized before they undertook this hazardous job of seizing the sanitizer and arresting its manufacturer.

It all started in June 2020 when the DG, GST Intelligence informed all the Chief Commissioners and other Commissioners that some manufacturers of hand sanitizers (alcohol-based) are wrongly classifying the said item under tariff heading 3004 (12% GST) whereas the said item is liable to be classified under tariff heading 3808 (18% GST). It has been informed that sugar mills and distilleries are also engaged in manufacturing/supplying alcohol-based hand sanitizers and are classifying the same under tariff heading 3004 (12% GST) whereas the same are correctly classifiable under heading 3808 (18% GST). Thus, the mis-classification of hand sanitizers appears to have resulted in substantial evasion of GST. A list of 62 manufacturers/suppliers of the item was prepared by DGGI headquarters by identifying the manufacturers with the help of online shopping platforms such as Amazon, Flipkart, etc.,

While this was in active progress, Springfields (India) Distilleries filed an application before the Authority for Advance Ruling in Goa that:

Hand Sanitizer is covered under HSN Code: 30049087 - Antihypertensive drugs: Antibacterial formulations not elsewhere specified or included - Rate of GST is 12%.

The learned Authority in its order dated 25.06.2020 - 2020-TIOL-173-AAR-GST held,

Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizers manufactured by the applicant are covered by HSN 3808 and are accordingly taxable at appropriate rate. [18%]

The AAR and the DGGI are in agreement and so the tax payable is 18% and if somebody paid 12% by mistake or otherwise, he could be in jail.

Next time you use the sanitizer to clean your hands, remember you have contributed 18% GST and some manufacturer who sent this sanitizer to you is in jail. Covid has the last laugh.

One year back, I asked,

Can't the Government make it a low tax rated item? Bureaucracy cannot move as fast as Corona and maybe we will have to wait for the next pandemic to have a low rate of tax for such essential items.

The second wave came and there was a huge demand for nil tax or a very low tax on covid relief materials. The good government reacted and even called for a GST Council meeting, which constituted a Group of Ministers and the Council met again and decided to lower the GST rates on these products.

The PIB Press Release immediately after the GST Council meeting on 12th June, stated that the tax on Hand Sanitizer would be reduced from 18% to 5%. In the Press Conference addressed by the Finance Minister, there was a question, "when are the notifications going to be issued?" The Finance Secretary assured that they would be issued very soon and they came up with the notifications late in the evening of 14th June, effective from 14th June.

But the problem is - have they reduced the tax on Hand Sanitizer?

The NOTIFICATION NO. 05/2021-Central Tax (Rate); Dated: June 14, 2021 , in Sl. No. 8 of the table has allowed a rate of 2.5% CGST for hand sanitizer.

8

3804 94

Hand Sanitizer

2.5%

You search all of the tariff and you will not find this heading 3804 94. Then what is exempted? DGGI and AAR assert that Hand Sanitizer should be classified under 3808, but now the Government says it attracts a concessional rate in 3804. If you were classifying the product under 3808, will you get the exemption now?

Well, probably what they meant was 3808 94 and not 3804 94. This is a small mistake and would eventually be corrected. These things do happen when you have to deal with too many things within too little time.

I decided not to get my next supply of Hand Sanitizer till the rate is confirmed. But as good fortune would have it, around 10 pm on 15th June 2021, I find that the government has issued a corrigendum asking us to read "3804 94" as "3808 94". Problem solved!

Couldn't they have mentioned "any chapter" instead of specifying the heading to the sixth digit and causing so much confusion?

It is amazing that the government could realise the mistake, understand it and correct it within a record time - sometimes the government works - fast.

Until Next Week.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Hand Sanitizer

Sir

Isn't it a masterstroke? If the manufactuer wants to claim exemption under Notification No.5/2021, the classification under 380894 has to be accepted. Thus the battle for classification under 3004 has to be given up and differential tax with interest for four years has to be paid.

If the old battle is to be continued, the supply should continue under 12% with prospect of paying differential tax with interest / penalty later and be in jail.

Ingenious!!!

L S KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate

Posted by
 
Sub: hand sanitizer

is hand a surface.
sanitization means preventing the diseaes by keeping away the viruses.

so hand sanitizers are human body spray protecting the human beings from the covid like diseases.

this has been canvassed throught last 24 months by the intelligent goverment on Ttelevision, phones, radio, print media etc.
hath dhoiye swasth rahiye.
in sab baton se ye proov ho raha ki sanitizer medicament hai kisi bhi tarah se disinfectant nahi hai.

fir kyon rate 18%.

fie is saal kam bhi ki ye maantey hue ki bhai haan ye covid men suraksha ke liye jaruri hai. to fir category yani chapter heading ya hsn 38 men kyon 3004 men kyon nahi.

pata nahi govt bholi hai ki officers and bureaucates chalak. ya majboor loktantra.

its a limit of senselessness.


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.