News Update

Right to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK’s key water supplier, Thames Water, slips into financial quagmireI-T- Sale consideration cannot be considered as unexplained cash credit if sale takes place in online platform and sale consideration is received through stock broker in banking channels : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineI-T- Section 69C includes expenditures reflected in account books, as well as those discovered during Search & Seizure for which no valid explanation is forthcoming from assessee: ITATUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesI-T- Penalty imposed u/s 273B upheld where assessee unable to provide just cause for failure to file audit report within prescribed due date as per Section 44AB: ITATPalestinian PM unveils new reform packageI-T- Assessee cannot contest validity of penalty notice on grounds of irrelevant provision not being struck off, by highlighting such defect for the first time before ITAT itself: ITATAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanGovt receives 7 bids for giga-scale Advanced Chemistry Cell under PLI10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashI-T- Lower authorities erred in disallowing long term capital loss : ITATSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case1351 candidates to contest in phase 3 of LS ElectionsI-T- Revisionary order u/s 263 invalidated where passed in ignorance of repeated factual submissions to prove that original assessment order is not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests: ITATIndian Coast Guard, Oman Coast Guard to jointly combat transnational illegal activities at seaST - Department cannot retain any amount which is otherwise not payable by the Assessee; nothing acts as embargo on assessee's right to demand refund of tax paid under misaken notion: CESTATAFMS, ICMR join hands to undertake biomedical research for Armed ForcesCus - If noticee seeks Cross Examination of such persons, same should be granted, appellant will produce all documentary evidence before Adjudicating Authority in support of their claim that seized gold is part of their normally procured gold in course of their commercial transactions: CESTAT
 
Compromising composite supply

JULY 11, 2022

By G Natarajan, Advocate, G N Law Associates

SECTION 2 (30) of the GST Acts define "composite supply" as below and the manner in which such composite supplies have to be taxed is laid down in Section 8. The said provisions are reproduced below.

Section. 2 (30) "composite supply" means a supply made by a taxable person to a recipient consisting of two or more taxable supplies of goods or services or both, or any combination thereof, which are naturally bundled and supplied in conjunction with each other in the ordinary course of business, one of which is a principal supply;

Section. 2 (90) "principal supply" means the supply of goods or services which constitutes the predominant element of a composite supply and to which any other supply forming part of that composite supply is ancillary.

Section 8. Tax liability on composite and mixed supplies. - The tax liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following manner, namely :-

(a) a composite supply comprising two or more supplies, one of which is a principal supply, shall be treated as a supply of such principal supply; and

(b) a mixed supply comprising two or more supplies shall be treated as a supply of that particular supply which attracts the highest rate of tax.

The composite supply principle owes its origin to the principle of "bundled service" under Service Tax regime, prescribed under Section 66 F of the Finance Act, 1994.

This time tested principle of composite supply was given a go by for the first time, when the Government prescribed that in respect of supply of renewable energy devices and parts thereof, along with their erection, commissioning and installation, the value of supply of goods would be 70 % of the gross value, attracting lesser rate of 5 % as supply of goods and the remaining 30 % of the value would be considered as the value of services and subjected to 12 % GST. Reference in this regard is made to the amendments made to S.No. 234 of Schedule I of Notification 1/2017 Central Tax (Rate) Dt. 28.06.2017, vide Notification 24/2018 Central Tax (Rate) Dt. 31.12.2018 and the amendment made to S.No. 38 of Notification 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) Dt. 28.06.2017, vide 27/2018 Central Tax (Rate) Dt. 31.12.2018.

This was necessitated due to various advance rulings, wherein it was held that such supply, erection, commission of renewable energy projects are "works contract" and as per S.No.6 (a) of Schedule II of the GST Act, to be considered as supply of service and attract 18 %.

As the supply, erection, commissioning of such renewable energy plants are always undertaken together, the intention of prescribing a lesser rate of 5 % for such goods was defeated. Thus a departure was made for a good reason and the Government prescribed 70 % of the as value of supply of goods and the balance 30 % as value of services. A correct approach should have been to clarify that such supply, erection, commissioning of renewable energy plants, constitute a composite supply and the tax treatment would be based on the "principal supply" i.e the supply of goods.

Now, for the second time, the Government is compromising the principle of composite supply, in proposing to tax renting of rooms in hospitals where the room rent is more than Rs.5,000 per day, though such supply of rooms is ancillary to the principal supply of health services being provided by hospitals, which is exempted.

Such blatant violation of legislative wisdom by executive notifications is not a welcome move, be it whether it is for the benefit of taxpayers or otherwise.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: composite supply

the article stated well sir as usual but ended sudddenlylike our hpe of itc being the sul of gst.
please write second part of it waiting.
the mohit mineral decision has opened the door for theives that is leal provisions by notification. they are no more excessive delegation rather they are now executive delegation.

where is the concept of charging section machinery provisions, substance over form. all lost

Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.