News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
GST Appellate Tribunal to be set up in 3 months - Really?

DECEMBER 14, 2022

By Vijay Kumar

HOT News in some social, digital, print, sensational media last week suggested that the GST Appellate Tribunal will be set up in about three months. The agonising wait is over and all our litigation issues will be taken up by the new Tribunal and we can all live happily ever after.

The congenital pessimist that I am, I hope no such thing happens; I know no such thing will happen. But then, back in 2017, I hoped that GST will not befall on this unsuspecting nation, but I was proved wrong and almost lost a livelihood. What they call legacy litigation of excise, customs, service tax cases in the CESTAT and High Courts kept my black coat and gown making respectably frequent trips to the dry cleaners.

But suddenly everybody lost interest in the CESTAT and like eager aspirants we all wait for the GST Tribunal.

The difference between the optimist and the pessimist is that the pessimist just has more data.

In December 2021, the government announced that the CESTAT had some 19 vacancies, 12 of Technical Members and 7 of Judicial Members, and initiated the process of selecting members. On 15th September 2022, the Department of Personnel and Training informed the Revenue Secretary that

the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet has approved the proposal of the Department of Revenue for appointment of following candidates, against 07 posts of Judicial Member and 12 posts of Technical Member in the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), in the salary of Rs. 2,25,000/-p m., for a period of 04 years, or till attaining the age of 67 years, whichever is earlier.

So, 19 eminent jurists have been selected and approved for appointment, but they are still waiting for that elusive appointment orders. It is more than a year since the selection process started, but the benches are still empty - just like that pessimistic glass of water being half empty. The sanctioned strength of the CESTAT is 33 Members and there are 19 vacancies, which means the tribunal is functioning with 14 members, less than half the required strength. The Court is half empty - you can also call it as half full, depending on whether you are a pessimist or an optimist, but the fact remains that we do not have enough judges in the CESTAT. And it is not as if we do not have qualified people to fill those vacancies; we have them, selected and approved, but yet to be given appointment orders. For the selected members, it is an embarrassing situation - they and all around them know that they are selected to occupy the exalted position in the bench; now it will be too embarrassing for them to practice in the CESTAT (or even High Courts) as they are already selected as Members of the Tribunal and will be addressed as 'my lords', but they do not know when the day will come for them to cross the bar to be in the elevated bench. Recently in a social gathering of CESTAT lawyers, I overheard somebody suggesting that we have to file a PIL in the Supreme Court to make the government give posting orders to these selected and approved waiting members of the Tribunal. And the CESTSAT has over 75000 pending cases.

This is the position of the CESTAT, which recently celebrated its 40th anniversary and we are optimistic that the mystical GST Appellate Tribunal will start functioning in three months. This is the height of hope and I remain a congenital pessimist.

It is not as if nothing has been done.

In the 28th GST Council Meeting held on 21 July, 2018, the Joint Secretary, Department of Revenue informed the Council that the draft rules of Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Appointment and Conditions of Service of President and Members) Rules, 2018 was approved by the GST Implementation Committee (GIC). He further stated that it was proposed to constitute a GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) National Bench at New Delhi and three Regional Benches at Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata and after seeking the recommendations and approval of the GST Council, approval would be taken for creation of necessary posts of Chairman and Members.

That was in July 2018!

On 13th March, 2019, the government issued a notification:

In exercise of the powers conferred by the section 109 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Central Government, on the recommendation of the Council, hereby notifies the creation of the National Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) at New Delhi, with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary).

So, the National Bench was created, but it remained a notional bench; no members were appointed and nobody knows where the bench is situated and where the bar is. That was more than three years ago. The Government even told the Parliament - a notification to constitute the National Bench of GSTAT at New Delhi has been issued in this regard. True, but notifications do not make a tribunal.

On 20th September 2019, the Madras High Court struck down Section 109(3) and 109(9) of the CGST Act, 2017, which prescribes that the tribunal shall consists of one Judicial Member, one Technical Member (Centre) and one Technical Member (State).

When can the GSTAT be launched?

The following steps are required:

1. The laws (Central and States) have to be amended. That is not an easy process. Some Under-secretary in the Board should draft an amendment and it has to go through various levels till the FM. Almost the same process has to be repeated in the Law Ministry and then GST Council. Then the law has to be passed in both houses of Parliament, signed by the President, and then notified. The States will have to repeat the process.

2. Government has to notify the Tribunal.

3. Process has to be initiated to select Members of the Tribunal

4. Infrastructure - buildings, computers, staff, finance etc., have to be arranged.

This will take at least two years, if the government shows some respect to the Courts.

Until then, tribunalised justice in GST will have to wait.

Until Next week


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Lack of Tribunal serves the governments better

"So, the National Bench was created, but it remained a notional bench;" That says everything. Who wants the GSTAT? Only the lawyers and litigants. Government does not need a Tribunal when it has enough coercive power under the Law to force the taxpayers to cough up money.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.