News Update

PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing sees incremental investment of Rs 8,390 CrG20 finance leaders agree to tax super-rich but forum not yet readyDPIIT promotes green logistics industry balancing economic growth and environmentIndia, US ink pact to stymie illegal trafficking of cultural propertyRailways expands tracks by 31,180 kmFroth in Yamuna river: Delhi complains to Centre against UP and HaryanaGovt to enhance reach of Indian Digital Public InfrastructureFormer BJP Minister says BJP has totally failed as Opposition in KarnatakaGovt provides incentives to small tea growersEU penalises 5 countries for infringing budget rulesI-T-Transaction involving transfer of unutilised shares cannot be deemed to be sale of shares so as to attract levy of Long Term Capital Gain u/s 112: ITATChina says Relations with Japan at critical stageST - Once the activity of appellant that is of forfeituring the amount of earnest money is not a declared service, question of retaining said money as consideration for rendering such service becomes absolutely redundant: CESTATEU medicines regulator disapproves Alzheimer’s new drugSC says no restrictions on voluntary name banners along Kanwar route eateriesFM favours debt reduction but sans affecting economic growthKargil Victory Day: PM warns Pak against practising terrorismChina pumps in subsidies worth USD 41 bn into car sectorMisc - Payments made to Government cannot be deemed to be a tax merely because statute provides for their recovery as arrears: SC CBMisc - Royalty not a tax; royalty is contractual consideration paid by mining lessee to lessor for enjoyment of mineral rights & liability to pay royalty arises out of contractual conditions of mining lease: SC CBMisc - Since power to tax mineral rights is provided for in Entry 50 of List II, Parliament cannot use its residuary powers in this subject matter: SC CBCus - Owner of goods has a liability to pay customs duty even after confiscated goods are redeemed on payment of fine - Interest follows: SC
 
Domestication of EXIM Containers

MAY 16, 2023

By Dr Sanjay Kalra, LLM., PhD (GST Law), Advocate, KPS Legal

1. NOTIFICATION No. 104/94-Cus., dated 16-3-1994 exempts Containers of durable nature and falling within the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, when imported into India, from the whole of the duty of customs leviable thereon under the said First Schedule; and the whole of the additional duty leviable thereon under Section 3 of the said Customs Tariff Act. For availing such duty exemption, the Shipping Line or the Importer has to execute a bond, in such form and for such sum as may be specified by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, binding himself to re- export the said containers within six months from the date of their importation. In the event of failure to do so, the Importer or the Shipping Line shall pay the duty leviable thereon. Such period of six months may be extended by the said Assistant Commissioner for such further period, as he may deem fit.

2. The CBEC vide Circular No. 83/98-Cus., dated 5-11-1998, expressed its concern stating that the Customs Houses are routinely granting such extensions for re-export of containers beyond six months. This casual approach leads to the possible use of such containers for domestic trade, adversely affecting the domestic industry engaged in manufacturing of marine containers.

3. While dealing with the specific grievances of the trade to allow the use of imported containers for carrying domestic cargo, the CBEC, vide its Letter F. No. 450/69/2000-Cus.IV dated 30.10.2001, decided on temporary basis that the containers imported under the said notification 104/94-Cus shall be allowed for the purpose of carrying domestic cargo, during the permitted period, pending re-export of the same.

4. The CBEC vide Circular No. 31/2005-Cus., dated 25-7-2005, stated that such containers, whether empty or loaded, intended for temporary admission, are allowed without filing a formal Bill of Entry for each container separately and the same may be moved out of the customs area on execution of a Bond. The Board has instructed to adhere to a simple uniform procedure for clearance of temporary importation of containers.

5. Thereafter, when the Trade & Industry expressed its concern about the increasing cost of coastal shipping caused by the limited availability of return cargo on most of the coastal shipping routes, the CBIC vide Circular No. 8/2019-Cus., dated 26-2-2019, has permitted the use of containers [which are availing benefit of notification No. 104/94 dated 16-3-1994] for the purpose of carrying domestic cargo during the stipulated period of 6 months or the extended period as may be allowed pending re-export of the same.

Conclusion: From the above, it implies that the Notification 104/94-Cus does not stipulate any condition as regard 'the Purpose of Use' of EXIM Containers during the stipulated/extended period within which they have to be re-exported. Inasmuch as, such containers can be used for carrying domestic cargo also.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Dr. Shailendra Kumar, Chairman, TIOL Knowledge Foundation, addressing the gathering



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.