News Update

India, ADB sign USD170 mn loan to strengthen pandemic preparedness and responseCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCHealth Ministry issues Advisory to States in view of Zika virus cases from MaharashtraCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCExpert Committee on Climate Finance submits Report on transition finance to IFSCACX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCWIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Export duty on SEZ clearances: Dear FM, Please take a decision quickly

JULY 1, 2008

By An Agitated Netizen

IT is more than a month since export duty has been levied on iron and steel products vide Notification No. 66/2008-Cus dt. 10/05/2008; however still there is no clarity as to whether the clearances of iron and steel products made to SEZ units attract export duty or not. The field formations of Finance Ministry (both Customs & Central Excise departments) are of view that SEZ clearances should also attract export duty as per SEZ Act.  It is learnt that  the intelligence agencies  of the department  are waiting in the wings to book cases against all manufacturers who have not paid export duty on clearances to SEZ. What is stopping these intelligence agencies from taking a precipitate action is the reports that the issue is already before Ministry of Finance for taking a decision. Though, the Finance Ministry is quick in enhancing the export duty on steel items from initial 10% to 15%, albeit in the name of containing price rise, it is unfortunate that it failed to take a decision to clear the ambiguity surrounding the issue of export duty liability on SEZ clearances.

The babus of the Ministry, whose salary is assured irrespective of whether they deliver any good or not, perhaps, do not understand the plight of running an industry, especially, in the regime of uncertain tax liabilities. The steel industry gets orders from SEZ units against much competition from others in the business, which force them to operate with very thin margins. In most of the cases the Purchase Orders are given by the SEZ Units as per the terms conditions dictated by them, and there is little scope for re-negotiation of price in the event of any new taxes imposed. In such a competitive market, if the steel units are saddled with 10%/15% of export duty, which will eat away little margins they have in the SEZ clearances and it would certainly spell doom for the industry. It is already more than a month since export duty was imposed on steel items and the industry is taking financial risk by clearing the goods to SEZs without paying export duty.  This risk is mounting with every passing day and the industry is hoping that the Finance Ministry would take a decision in their favour. However, if the Finance Ministry decides that export duty is liable to be paid on SEZ clearances, the industry has to cough up huge amounts towards as export duty liability (with interest) for which the industry is not financially prepared for nor it can hope to  realize export duty from the units in SEZ. Needless to say this will ultimately wreck the steel units, depending on SEZ clearances, beyond repair. When this uncertainty is breaking nerves of management, the industry is receiving instructions, on the other hand, from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry vide letter F.No. 6/2/2008-SEZ dt. 23/05/2008 and the Development Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zone letter No. 9/SEZ/Misc./2008 dt. 2/06/2008 for executing bonds / bank guarantees to cover the export duty liability.                                   

In these days of uncertainty, a ray of hope came from the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad III Commissionerate, Hyderabad, who has taken a view by clarifying that clearances to SEZ units do not attract export duty, as SEZ units are with in the customs territory of India and as such the clearances to SEZ are not to be treated as “exported out of India”.  Though the industry is gladdened at the decision of the Commissioner and appreciate the Commissioner for taking such a bold decision, on an issue which even the FM or CBEC failed to take, the industry is worried, at the same time, as to how far this clarification given by the Commissioner, Hyderabad III Commissionerate, is binding on the officers of his own department or on the authorized officers of SEZ.

When the industry is in this confusion, it seems the officers of the department are equally confused as to where the export duty is to be collected. While the Central Excise officers are of the view that the export duty is to be collected at Range level by mentioning in the ARE-1s, the Customs officers manning the SEZs want us to file an Export Bill so that they can assess the export duty liability.  At some places the officers are insisting execution of Bonds (as per the directions of DGFT / Development Commissioners of SEZ mentioned above) before effecting clearances whereas in other places clearances are being allowed without any hassles. May be the department is of view that that duty can be demanded at any time before one year.

It is unfortunate, that this is happening in a country where the Finance Ministry is headed by a person educated in Harward Business School, who is expected to know better the difficulties the industry to plan for its finances / capital in an environment of uncertain tax regime. The steel industry  appreciate the recent preaching given by FM to OPEC countries about the problems faced by the economies world over due to uncertain oil prices. The industry wants the FM to understand, the plight of the steel industry (especially those who are supplying Iron and steel goods to SEZs) reeling under uncertain tax regime with the same vigour.

Dear FM! this issue is not  as knotty as J& K problem so that it can  be passed on to next generation, nor is this a Nuclear Deal issue where the ministry can have umpteen number negotiations with communist colleagues without taking a decision, just to fool the gullible people of this country.  For the industry, the issue of export duty on SEZ clearances is hanging like a sword of Damocles, leaving the management sleepless nights.  The industry is praying the FM to take a decision, quickly, this way or that way, it any way is not going to spoil his prospects of winning the next election.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: export and sez

You send iron to sez,we will charge duty coz it is a foreign territory under SEZ ACT,

You send services to sez, we will not allow refund as it is not export under CUSTOMS ACT,

You can have rebate from me, but not the CENVAT under EXCISE ACT.

Your business plans may go awry,but our single window will take years to react.



Posted by pc chidu
 
Sub: life takes a full circle for steel industry

First things first. The SEZ Act prevails over all other laws and a plain reading of the SEZ Act gives an impression that SEZs are imaginary territories outside India. Trade and Industry misplaced its loyalties with the Commerce Ministry when it promised a duty free regime without assessing the underlying fact that it is the Finance Ministry which wields the whip of duties and taxes in this country. When this overriding provision was put in place in the SEZ law, they rejoiced because it would override any prank (I mean levy) from the Revenue. Unfortunately, they did not envisage that this deeming fiction would backfire in the form an export duty levy under the Customs legislation.

Moreover SEZs have the option of importing steel from outside India at competitive prices and they will not lose anything in the bargain. As for the domestic steel industry, they have made enough money as cartels over the last couple of years due to the boom in real estate and infrastructure sector, now the blossoming SEZs though would provide immense business opportunity for them to rake in further moolah, this export duty would spoil their party. But, anyway the loss in business from SEZs would even out the immense profits they made from the construction sector in the last few years. Gentlemen, in whatever field you are, remember the bottom line that "life comes full circle".

Posted by santosh hatwar
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.