News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthi’s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
Export duty on SEZ clearances: Dear FM, Please take a decision quickly

JULY 1, 2008

By An Agitated Netizen

IT is more than a month since export duty has been levied on iron and steel products vide Notification No. 66/2008-Cus dt. 10/05/2008; however still there is no clarity as to whether the clearances of iron and steel products made to SEZ units attract export duty or not. The field formations of Finance Ministry (both Customs & Central Excise departments) are of view that SEZ clearances should also attract export duty as per SEZ Act.  It is learnt that  the intelligence agencies  of the department  are waiting in the wings to book cases against all manufacturers who have not paid export duty on clearances to SEZ. What is stopping these intelligence agencies from taking a precipitate action is the reports that the issue is already before Ministry of Finance for taking a decision. Though, the Finance Ministry is quick in enhancing the export duty on steel items from initial 10% to 15%, albeit in the name of containing price rise, it is unfortunate that it failed to take a decision to clear the ambiguity surrounding the issue of export duty liability on SEZ clearances.

The babus of the Ministry, whose salary is assured irrespective of whether they deliver any good or not, perhaps, do not understand the plight of running an industry, especially, in the regime of uncertain tax liabilities. The steel industry gets orders from SEZ units against much competition from others in the business, which force them to operate with very thin margins. In most of the cases the Purchase Orders are given by the SEZ Units as per the terms conditions dictated by them, and there is little scope for re-negotiation of price in the event of any new taxes imposed. In such a competitive market, if the steel units are saddled with 10%/15% of export duty, which will eat away little margins they have in the SEZ clearances and it would certainly spell doom for the industry. It is already more than a month since export duty was imposed on steel items and the industry is taking financial risk by clearing the goods to SEZs without paying export duty.  This risk is mounting with every passing day and the industry is hoping that the Finance Ministry would take a decision in their favour. However, if the Finance Ministry decides that export duty is liable to be paid on SEZ clearances, the industry has to cough up huge amounts towards as export duty liability (with interest) for which the industry is not financially prepared for nor it can hope to  realize export duty from the units in SEZ. Needless to say this will ultimately wreck the steel units, depending on SEZ clearances, beyond repair. When this uncertainty is breaking nerves of management, the industry is receiving instructions, on the other hand, from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry vide letter F.No. 6/2/2008-SEZ dt. 23/05/2008 and the Development Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Special Economic Zone letter No. 9/SEZ/Misc./2008 dt. 2/06/2008 for executing bonds / bank guarantees to cover the export duty liability.                                   

In these days of uncertainty, a ray of hope came from the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad III Commissionerate, Hyderabad, who has taken a view by clarifying that clearances to SEZ units do not attract export duty, as SEZ units are with in the customs territory of India and as such the clearances to SEZ are not to be treated as “exported out of India”.  Though the industry is gladdened at the decision of the Commissioner and appreciate the Commissioner for taking such a bold decision, on an issue which even the FM or CBEC failed to take, the industry is worried, at the same time, as to how far this clarification given by the Commissioner, Hyderabad III Commissionerate, is binding on the officers of his own department or on the authorized officers of SEZ.

When the industry is in this confusion, it seems the officers of the department are equally confused as to where the export duty is to be collected. While the Central Excise officers are of the view that the export duty is to be collected at Range level by mentioning in the ARE-1s, the Customs officers manning the SEZs want us to file an Export Bill so that they can assess the export duty liability.  At some places the officers are insisting execution of Bonds (as per the directions of DGFT / Development Commissioners of SEZ mentioned above) before effecting clearances whereas in other places clearances are being allowed without any hassles. May be the department is of view that that duty can be demanded at any time before one year.

It is unfortunate, that this is happening in a country where the Finance Ministry is headed by a person educated in Harward Business School, who is expected to know better the difficulties the industry to plan for its finances / capital in an environment of uncertain tax regime. The steel industry  appreciate the recent preaching given by FM to OPEC countries about the problems faced by the economies world over due to uncertain oil prices. The industry wants the FM to understand, the plight of the steel industry (especially those who are supplying Iron and steel goods to SEZs) reeling under uncertain tax regime with the same vigour.

Dear FM! this issue is not  as knotty as J& K problem so that it can  be passed on to next generation, nor is this a Nuclear Deal issue where the ministry can have umpteen number negotiations with communist colleagues without taking a decision, just to fool the gullible people of this country.  For the industry, the issue of export duty on SEZ clearances is hanging like a sword of Damocles, leaving the management sleepless nights.  The industry is praying the FM to take a decision, quickly, this way or that way, it any way is not going to spoil his prospects of winning the next election.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: export and sez

You send iron to sez,we will charge duty coz it is a foreign territory under SEZ ACT,

You send services to sez, we will not allow refund as it is not export under CUSTOMS ACT,

You can have rebate from me, but not the CENVAT under EXCISE ACT.

Your business plans may go awry,but our single window will take years to react.



Posted by pc chidu
 
Sub: life takes a full circle for steel industry

First things first. The SEZ Act prevails over all other laws and a plain reading of the SEZ Act gives an impression that SEZs are imaginary territories outside India. Trade and Industry misplaced its loyalties with the Commerce Ministry when it promised a duty free regime without assessing the underlying fact that it is the Finance Ministry which wields the whip of duties and taxes in this country. When this overriding provision was put in place in the SEZ law, they rejoiced because it would override any prank (I mean levy) from the Revenue. Unfortunately, they did not envisage that this deeming fiction would backfire in the form an export duty levy under the Customs legislation.

Moreover SEZs have the option of importing steel from outside India at competitive prices and they will not lose anything in the bargain. As for the domestic steel industry, they have made enough money as cartels over the last couple of years due to the boom in real estate and infrastructure sector, now the blossoming SEZs though would provide immense business opportunity for them to rake in further moolah, this export duty would spoil their party. But, anyway the loss in business from SEZs would even out the immense profits they made from the construction sector in the last few years. Gentlemen, in whatever field you are, remember the bottom line that "life comes full circle".

Posted by santosh hatwar
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.