News Update

India, ADB sign USD170 mn loan to strengthen pandemic preparedness and responseCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCHealth Ministry issues Advisory to States in view of Zika virus cases from MaharashtraCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCExpert Committee on Climate Finance submits Report on transition finance to IFSCACX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCWIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Export to SEZ - Commerce Ministry's clarification - It's still not export!

JULY 10, 2008

By A Netizen

NOT a happy news for the steel units clearing goods to SEZs, the Ministry of Commerce has at last  clarified, vide letter dt. 30/063/2008, that clearances of steel products to SEZ attract export duty.

A quick recap of events:

The Government has imposed export duty on certain steel products by declaring them under Second Schedule of Customs Tariff Act during the enactment of Finance Bill, 2008. The government vide Notification No. 66/2008-Cus dt. 10/05/2008, has brought into effect the levy of export duty on certain iron and steel products @ 10%.   This notification has been amended vide Notification No. 77/2008-Cus dt. 13/06/2008 by substituting ‘Nil” rate against some of the iron steel products ( Sl. No. 7, 8 & 9 )  mentioned in the Notification No. 66/08.  At the same time it has also enhanced the rate of export duty of some of the products like hot rolled Bars and rods of iron or steel from 10% to 15%. As there was no clarity on the issue whether the clearances made to SEZ units would attract export duty or not, the issue was agitated all over the country seeking a clarification from the Ministry of Finance. As the SEZs are pet babies of MOC, it appears that the Ministry of Commerce has taken up the issue with the Ministry of Finance to consider exempting the clearances made to SEZ from the purview of export duty, and hoping for a positive reply from MOF. However, the Ministry of Commerce has to meekly accept the clarification given by DOR stating that export duty is applicable to clearances made to SEZs from the date of Notification No. 66/08.

A quick reading of the letter dt. 30/06/2008 would convey that the decision has been arrived keeping revenue aspect in the mind, as the letter does not discuss anything about the legality of the issue and would not justify keeping the issue on fire for more than a month by DOR just to say that the clearances to SEZs attract export duty, without any discussion.

Though it is not known as to which of the provisions of the SEZ Act/Customs Act prompted the MOF/DOR to come to conclusion that clearances to SEZ also attracts export duty, a close examination of some of the provision of the Customs Act/SEZ Act would leave an element of doubt regarding the  correctness of the clarification given.

It should be understood that Export duty is levied and collected as per the provision of Section 12 of Customs Act (Not under SEZ Act) which reads as follows:

SECTION 12.. Dutiable goods – (1) Except as otherwise provided in this Act, or any other law for the time being in force, duties of customs shall be levied at such rates as may be specified under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975 , or any other law for the time being in force, on goods imported into, or exported from, India.
 
From the above it is clear that export duty can only be levied on the goods “exported from India”.

This position of law is further substantiated by the definition of “export” , “ export goods” and “ India” given under Section 2 of the Customs Act. The relevant terms are defined in the Customs Act as follows:

 “export”, with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means taking out of India to a place outside India;

“Export goods” means any goods which are to be taken out of India to a place outside India;

“India” includes the territorial waters of India;

“Indian customs waters” means the waters extending into the sea up to the limit of contiguous zone of India under section 5 of the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 (80 of 1976 and includes any bay, gulf, harbour, creek or tidal river;

The above definitions given in the Customs Act makes it very clear that export duty can only be levied if the goods are taken out of territorial waters of India. The Notification No. 66/08 also contain the words “ exported out of India” , which also  means that the Second Schedule of Customs Tariff Act ( by which export duty is levied )  seeks to  levy of export duty only on the goods exported out of India.

The definition given for “export” in the SEZ Act is not much of relevance so far as the levy of export duty is concerned. Though the SEZ Act defines any clearances from DTA to SEZ Unit as constituting export, this is done only for the limited purpose of conferring export benefits to clearances made to SEZs by DTA units and as such this definition of export given in the SEZ Act will not have any effect for the purpose of levy of export duty, by virtue of Section 12 of Customs Act and the term “export “ defined under the Customs Act. In a nutshell, export duty can only be levied if the goods are exported from India not withstanding the definition for “export” appearing in SEZ Act.

Is SEZ out of India”?

It is being strongly advocated that SEZ constitute foreign territories by virtue of Section 53 of SEZ Act. However, the Section 53 of SEZ Act recognizes SEZ as the territory outside the Customs territory of India for limited purpose. This will not override as to what constitute “India” as per the definition given in the Customs Act. This point is very clear from the wordings of Section 53 of SEZ Act, which reads as follows:

Section 53. A Special Economic Zone shall, on and from the appointed day, be deemed to be a territory outside the customs territory of India for the purposes of undertaking the authorized operations.

(2) A Special Economic Zone shall, with effect from such date as Central Government may notify, be deemed to be a port, inland container depot, land station and land customs stations, as the case may be, under section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962

Moreover , the word “India” has not been defined in the SEZ Act, hence the definition given in the Customs Act for the word “India” will hold good even for the purpose of  SEZ Act also, as per the Section 2 (zd) of the SEZ Act( which reads as follows) :

(zd) all other words and expressions used and not defined in this Act but defined in the Central Excise Act, 1944, the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, the Income–tax Act, 1961, the Customs Act, 1962 and the Foreign Trade ( Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in those Acts.

In terms of the above provisions, it is only the export made outside the territorial waters would constitute as “export” for the purpose of Section 12 of Customs Act and clearances to SEZ cannot be construed as export out of India.

Further, levy of export duty on clearances to SEZ units would defeat the very purpose of presence of Section 7 of SEZ Act, which reads as below:

Section 7: Any goods or services exported out of, or imported into, or procured from the Domestic Tariff Area by, -

(i) a Unit in a Special Economic Zone; or

(ii) a Developer;

shall, subject to such terms, conditions and limitations, as may be prescribed, be exempt from the payment of taxes, duties or cess under all enactments specified in the First Schedule.

The above discussed provisions and also comprehensive understanding of other provisions of SEZ Act and SEZ Rules will make it clear that the SEZ Act does not seek to covey the meaning that SEZs are outside the Customs Territory of India  and the provisions of SEZ Act does not in any way  override the provisions of Customs Act so far as what constitute the meaning of words “ exported out of India”

Thus the issue is not as simple as it is made out to be and the clarification given by MOC is open for challenge in the courts of law and ultimately it is the consultants who benefit most.

A letter signed on 30th June, which seeks to clarify such an important issue agitated all over the county has taken 10 days to reach the field formations or is it a case of signing with back date. Whatever may be!

Also see our Previous Edits on this Issue

1) Is Export duty payable by DTA units for supplies to SEZs? If at all payable who is liable to pay?

2) Export duty on SEZ clearances: Dear FM, Please take a decision quickly


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Within and Without

Dear Author,

This is jaikumar, advocate from swamy associates. you have penned a reasoned article. today the whole of India is divided on the applicability of export duty on clearances to SEZ. Notwithstanding all the legal intrepretaions, let me put a layman question. let us assume the clearances by a DTA unit to a SEZ are exempted from export duty. Now, as per Section 7 of the SEZ Act, all exports made by the SEZ are exempted from all duties, including export duty, under all enactments, which would include the export duty too. In other words, the clearances from SEZ unit are exempted from the export duty too. further, trading by SEZ is not prohibited. In such a situation, if it is contended that the export duty is not applicable to SEZs, then all steel exporters can, at the first place can clear thier goods to SEZ, and then export the same from SEZ to thier foreign destinations, avoiding the export duty at all!!!! Do you agree to this modus operandi????

jk

p.s when i explained about an SEZ as a foriegn territory, my daughter asked me do we need a passport and visa to go there???

Posted by jaikumar seetharaman
 
Sub: export duty on steel

The relevance of definition of export for the purpose of sez in relation to supplies to sez cannot be ruled out. For what purpose the definition was created i.e. whether to give export incentives or otherwise cannot be looked into for interpretation of law as it would tentamount to looking into the intention of legislature. Therefore, no view is free from doubt and absolute. It will be of interest to note as to what controversy was addressed,if any by the two Ministeries and whether the decision was approached from legal angle or on administrative considerations.

Posted by somesharora somesharora
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.