News Update

Yogi orders Judicial Probe into Hathras tragedyIndia, ADB sign USD170 mn loan to strengthen pandemic preparedness and responseBengal Governor gripes about protocol lapses during Siliguri visit; writes to State GovtCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCHealth Ministry issues Advisory to States in view of Zika virus cases from MaharashtraCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCExpert Committee on Climate Finance submits Report on transition finance to IFSCAGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCWIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June month

MESSAGE BOARD

   

Myth of transfer of business as a going concern being invariably exempt


Transfer of a going concern when a supply of goods and when a service

The term “going concern” has no place in the GST Act. However one can refer to the pronouncement of the Advance Authority Ruling in case of Rajashri Foods Pvt Ltd for the same as mentioned below:

A going concern is a concept of accounting and applies to the business of the company as a whole. Transfer of a going concern means transfer of a running business which is capable of being carried on by the purchaser as an independent business. Such transfer of business as a whole will comprise comprehensive transfer of immovable property, goods and transfer of unexecuted orders, employees, goodwill etc.

The transfer of business assets implies where the part of assets are transferred and not the whole business, i.e. the liabilities remain in the books of the transferor, whereas in transfer of business all assets and liabilities are transferred together. The concept of transfer of going concern comes handy when the business as a whole is transferred, however case laws and analysis do suggest the likelihood of transfer of assets as a going concern.The Author is quite right when he says that there could be transfer of a going concern involving only assets, which like piercing the corporate veil, may have to be looked into, to ascertain first hand whether it is a transfer of a business as a going concern or a mere transfer of a going concern, confined to assets alone. while the former will be a supply of service duly attracting the exemptin under the Notification No.12/2017, the latter may attract tax as a supply of goods as rightly pointed out by the Author. My point is why wake a sleeping dog, let it lie sleeping.There are enough to worry about already and why rake up an issue when the Government itself is favorably disposed to the view of exemption of transfer of a going concern regardless of the transfer some of the assets alone. In any case the Purchase consideration will decide the measure of tax here. In fact if it is not exempted , it is good from ITC point of view, as it will not entail reversal of credit. Otherwise, reversal of credit will arise in case of holding the transfer as exempted in terms of Sec 17(2). Think about all this. I have expressed my doubt regarding the same in my article on the same earlier here.

srinivasan krishnamachari 18/08/2020

 

Back

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.